"If Greece had gone through a very normal political life, I may have not been in politics. But just the fact that I lived through huge upheavals and very difficult struggles and polarisation and the barbarism of dictatorships - that made me feel that we had to change this country"
About this Quote
Politics here isn’t framed as ambition but as a kind of historical draft notice. Papandreou casts his career as contingent: if Greece had enjoyed the boring, procedural rhythm of a “very normal political life,” he implies he might have stayed out. That conditional does a lot of work. It recasts power-seeking as reluctant duty, a familiar move in democratic storytelling, but sharpened by Greece’s 20th-century record of rupture: civil conflict’s aftershocks, intense ideological polarization, and the 1967-74 military junta. The phrase “barbarism of dictatorships” is deliberately blunt, less policy language than moral indictment, meant to draw a bright line between legitimate politics and coercive rule.
The subtext is also personal branding. Papandreou is not just any politician; he’s the heir to a dynasty whose name is entangled with the country’s modern turbulence. By locating his entry into politics in lived “upheavals,” he tries to launder inheritance into testimony. He’s saying: I didn’t choose this because it was available to me, I chose it because the country was on fire.
Notice the sequencing: upheavals, struggles, polarization, dictatorships. He compresses decades into an emotional escalation that ends in a single imperative: “we had to change this country.” The “we” is the key rhetorical pivot. It recruits the listener into a collective project, and it dodges the vanity of “I will fix it” without surrendering leadership. In a nation where legitimacy is always haunted by past illegitimacy, he’s making the case that his politics are an antidote, not just a career.
The subtext is also personal branding. Papandreou is not just any politician; he’s the heir to a dynasty whose name is entangled with the country’s modern turbulence. By locating his entry into politics in lived “upheavals,” he tries to launder inheritance into testimony. He’s saying: I didn’t choose this because it was available to me, I chose it because the country was on fire.
Notice the sequencing: upheavals, struggles, polarization, dictatorships. He compresses decades into an emotional escalation that ends in a single imperative: “we had to change this country.” The “we” is the key rhetorical pivot. It recruits the listener into a collective project, and it dodges the vanity of “I will fix it” without surrendering leadership. In a nation where legitimacy is always haunted by past illegitimacy, he’s making the case that his politics are an antidote, not just a career.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Georgios
Add to List





