"If I can't affect some change in six years, maybe I'm in the wrong place"
About this Quote
A politician saying he needs to "affect some change" in six years is really making a bid for legitimacy in a job the public increasingly suspects is built to avoid it. Nethercutt’s line turns the Senate’s six-year term into a moral stopwatch: enough time to prove you’re not just collecting a title, cutting ribbons, and laundering ambition through procedure. It’s a self-imposed performance metric, and that’s the point. In an era when incumbency can look like a career track, he frames tenure as a trial period.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke of the institution he wants to succeed in. Washington runs on delay: committees, holds, leadership bottlenecks, carefully timed half-measures. By insisting that six years should be sufficient, he’s either signaling confidence in his own influence or, more plausibly, suggesting that if the system can’t be moved, the ethical response is to leave rather than rationalize inertia. It’s virtue language aimed at voters who want impact, not process.
Context matters because “change” is elastic. It can mean a major bill, a regulatory shift, a budget earmark for the district, or simply moving a party line. The quote works because it lets every listener fill in their preferred version of change while still sounding rigorous. It also smuggles in a promise: judge me on outcomes. That’s refreshing, and risky, in a capital designed to make outcomes hard to measure.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke of the institution he wants to succeed in. Washington runs on delay: committees, holds, leadership bottlenecks, carefully timed half-measures. By insisting that six years should be sufficient, he’s either signaling confidence in his own influence or, more plausibly, suggesting that if the system can’t be moved, the ethical response is to leave rather than rationalize inertia. It’s virtue language aimed at voters who want impact, not process.
Context matters because “change” is elastic. It can mean a major bill, a regulatory shift, a budget earmark for the district, or simply moving a party line. The quote works because it lets every listener fill in their preferred version of change while still sounding rigorous. It also smuggles in a promise: judge me on outcomes. That’s refreshing, and risky, in a capital designed to make outcomes hard to measure.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List











