"If I designed a computer with 200 chips, I tried to design it with 150. And then I would try to design it with 100. I just tried to find every trick I could in life to design things real tiny"
About this Quote
Wozniak’s brag isn’t about chips; it’s about control. In a culture that often equates progress with accumulation, he’s describing a private sport: subtracting parts until the machine feels inevitable. “Every trick I could” lands like a confession of joyful rule-breaking, the hacker ethos before it became a brand identity. The intent is practical - fewer chips means cheaper, faster, easier to manufacture - but the subtext is aesthetic. He’s chasing elegance, the kind you can’t market with a spec sheet because it reads as taste: the clean line, the hidden complexity, the solution that looks obvious only after someone bleeds for it.
The rhetorical rhythm matters: 200 to 150 to 100. It’s iterative, almost musical, a countdown that frames engineering as relentless editing. That’s a distinctly Wozniak posture: less the corporate “visionary” and more the kid in the garage who can’t stop optimizing because the puzzle is the reward. It also quietly separates him from Silicon Valley’s later appetite for bloat - feature creep, surveillance layers, endless software patches. Hardware miniaturization here is a proxy for a broader philosophy: real power comes from removing dependencies, not stacking them.
Contextually, this is early personal computing when constraints were brutal - cost, heat, memory, physical space. Shrinking wasn’t a lifestyle slogan; it was how you made something ordinary people could buy and actually use. The line captures a foundational Apple myth in its rawer form: not luxury, not “think different,” but obsessive simplicity as a competitive weapon.
The rhetorical rhythm matters: 200 to 150 to 100. It’s iterative, almost musical, a countdown that frames engineering as relentless editing. That’s a distinctly Wozniak posture: less the corporate “visionary” and more the kid in the garage who can’t stop optimizing because the puzzle is the reward. It also quietly separates him from Silicon Valley’s later appetite for bloat - feature creep, surveillance layers, endless software patches. Hardware miniaturization here is a proxy for a broader philosophy: real power comes from removing dependencies, not stacking them.
Contextually, this is early personal computing when constraints were brutal - cost, heat, memory, physical space. Shrinking wasn’t a lifestyle slogan; it was how you made something ordinary people could buy and actually use. The line captures a foundational Apple myth in its rawer form: not luxury, not “think different,” but obsessive simplicity as a competitive weapon.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Steve
Add to List





