"If I remember rightly Holland for instance has something like 45, and it's a much smaller country. In comparison we have very few and they are very badly financed"
About this Quote
Rogers is doing what good architects often do in public: he talks numbers to smuggle in values. The line reads like a casual comparison, but it’s a pressure point aimed at policy. “If I remember rightly” isn’t uncertainty so much as a rhetorical softener, a way to deliver an indictment without sounding doctrinaire. By choosing Holland as the foil - compact, orderly, famously serious about planning - he’s invoking a whole civic culture in a single datapoint. Forty-five of something (schools, institutions, design bodies, public commissions) becomes shorthand for a system that treats the built environment as public infrastructure rather than private styling.
The subtext is that Britain, despite its global cultural capital, behaves like a provincial landlord when it comes to architecture: too few institutions, too little money, too much improvisation. “Very few” lands as a diagnosis of thin cultural scaffolding; “very badly financed” is the real charge, because underfunding isn’t neutral. It produces short-term thinking, timid briefs, compromised materials, and a public realm that looks accidental.
Contextually, this sits neatly in Rogers’ long campaign for architecture as a social project - from the high-tech optimism of the Pompidou era to his later work on urban policy and public space. He’s not romanticizing design; he’s arguing for capacity. The comparison to Holland frames investment as a choice, not a fate, and turns a technical complaint into a civic accusation: if a smaller country can afford to take the built world seriously, why can’t we?
The subtext is that Britain, despite its global cultural capital, behaves like a provincial landlord when it comes to architecture: too few institutions, too little money, too much improvisation. “Very few” lands as a diagnosis of thin cultural scaffolding; “very badly financed” is the real charge, because underfunding isn’t neutral. It produces short-term thinking, timid briefs, compromised materials, and a public realm that looks accidental.
Contextually, this sits neatly in Rogers’ long campaign for architecture as a social project - from the high-tech optimism of the Pompidou era to his later work on urban policy and public space. He’s not romanticizing design; he’s arguing for capacity. The comparison to Holland frames investment as a choice, not a fate, and turns a technical complaint into a civic accusation: if a smaller country can afford to take the built world seriously, why can’t we?
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List
