"If I were asked for a one-sentence sound bite on religion, I would say I was against it"
About this Quote
The subtext is shaped by Rushdie’s biography, which makes “religion” less a private faith than a public force with teeth. For a writer who lived under the shadow of the fatwa after The Satanic Verses, religion isn’t an abstract set of metaphysical claims; it’s an institution that can mobilize censorship, violence, and state complicity. That experience sharpens the sentence into something closer to self-defense than contrarianism.
Intent matters here: Rushdie isn’t staging atheism as edgy branding. He’s signaling a broader stance against religious authority when it collides with free expression, pluralism, and the messy rights of artists to offend. The phrasing “I was against it” is deliberately unphilosophical, almost schoolyard simple, which is the point: when power is dressed up as sanctity, refusing reverence can be the most honest language available.
It also smuggles in a warning: if the conversation only permits sound bites, expect them to come back as weapons.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Rushdie, Salman. (2026, January 17). If I were asked for a one-sentence sound bite on religion, I would say I was against it. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-i-were-asked-for-a-one-sentence-sound-bite-on-71386/
Chicago Style
Rushdie, Salman. "If I were asked for a one-sentence sound bite on religion, I would say I was against it." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-i-were-asked-for-a-one-sentence-sound-bite-on-71386/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If I were asked for a one-sentence sound bite on religion, I would say I was against it." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-i-were-asked-for-a-one-sentence-sound-bite-on-71386/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.





