"If Japan had been near to either England or France, war would have broken out long ago"
About this Quote
Harris, a businessman turned America’s first consul to Japan, is speaking from the pressure-cooker years around the 1850s, when Western powers were prying open Asian ports. Britain had just demonstrated how commerce could be enforced at gunpoint in China; France was expanding its imperial footprint. Harris is effectively saying: don’t mistake Japan’s continued sovereignty for a special respect earned. It’s an accident of distance.
The quote also doubles as a pitch for urgency. If proximity breeds war, then new steam routes, coaling stations, and faster navies collapse the very buffer he’s describing. The future will bring “nearness” even if the map doesn’t change. Underneath is a hard-nosed realism: international relations are less about mutual understanding than about reach, logistics, and appetite. Harris isn’t praising peace; he’s diagnosing the conditions that delay conquest - and warning Japan, and his own government, that the clock is already ticking.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Harris, Townsend. (2026, January 17). If Japan had been near to either England or France, war would have broken out long ago. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-japan-had-been-near-to-either-england-or-66281/
Chicago Style
Harris, Townsend. "If Japan had been near to either England or France, war would have broken out long ago." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-japan-had-been-near-to-either-england-or-66281/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If Japan had been near to either England or France, war would have broken out long ago." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-japan-had-been-near-to-either-england-or-66281/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.

