"If language did not affect behavior, it could have no meaning"
About this Quote
Pike links meaning to consequences. Words matter because they move people: they redirect attention, alter expectations, coordinate actions, and reshape social relationships. A warning sign makes us stop; a promise makes us wait; a diagnosis changes how we treat a body; a name establishes kinship or rank. If an utterance left the world of action untouched, it would be indistinguishable from meaningless noise. Meaning, then, is not a static property inside words but a pattern of effects within human conduct. This perspective aligns with pragmatism and the insight that meaning is use: what we understand a sentence to mean is bound up with what we are prepared to do, allow, feel, or infer when we encounter it.
As a linguist and linguistic anthropologist, Pike pursued a functional account of language in real communities. His emic/etic distinction and tagmemic theory focus on how linguistic forms operate within cultural systems. For him, grasping a language requires seeing how its expressions play roles in lived practices, rituals, negotiations, and everyday tasks. Translation succeeds not by matching dictionary entries but by reproducing the behavioral and social effects that a native phrase has among its speakers. Even apparently neutral descriptions affect behavior by revising beliefs and expectations, which in turn guide choices. Laws are words that alter rights and duties; prayers are words that regulate attention and emotion; jokes are words that trigger shared frames and laughter. The behavioral reach of language includes inner behavior as well: shifts in perception, intention, and valuation that precede outward action.
Pike is not advocating a crude behaviorism that denies inner life. He is insisting that meaning cannot be severed from its practical bearings. Language is a species of human action, woven into the norms and goals of a culture. To ask what a word means is to ask what it does in the lives of those who use it, how it orients them, and what changes it reliably brings about in their interactions with others and with the world.
As a linguist and linguistic anthropologist, Pike pursued a functional account of language in real communities. His emic/etic distinction and tagmemic theory focus on how linguistic forms operate within cultural systems. For him, grasping a language requires seeing how its expressions play roles in lived practices, rituals, negotiations, and everyday tasks. Translation succeeds not by matching dictionary entries but by reproducing the behavioral and social effects that a native phrase has among its speakers. Even apparently neutral descriptions affect behavior by revising beliefs and expectations, which in turn guide choices. Laws are words that alter rights and duties; prayers are words that regulate attention and emotion; jokes are words that trigger shared frames and laughter. The behavioral reach of language includes inner behavior as well: shifts in perception, intention, and valuation that precede outward action.
Pike is not advocating a crude behaviorism that denies inner life. He is insisting that meaning cannot be severed from its practical bearings. Language is a species of human action, woven into the norms and goals of a culture. To ask what a word means is to ask what it does in the lives of those who use it, how it orients them, and what changes it reliably brings about in their interactions with others and with the world.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List
