"If merely 'feeling good' could decide, drunkenness would be the supremely valid human experience"
About this Quote
The subtext is a warning aimed at a culture (and a philosophical mood) eager to cash out big questions in private satisfaction. James is often associated with pragmatism and the legitimacy of lived experience, so this quip also functions as self-policing: pragmatism isn’t a license for hedonistic relativism. A belief can be "useful" in the narrow sense of mood management and still be corrosive in the broader sense of agency, relationships, and continuity of self. Drunkenness offers the caricature of a life optimized for immediate affect while eroding the very capacities that make a life cohere.
Context matters: James wrote in an era of industrial acceleration, new psychologies, and anxieties about modern willpower. He’s carving a lane between sterile rationalism and the seductions of pure feeling. The line insists that validity has to include consequences over time - not just the glow in the moment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
James, William. (2026, January 17). If merely 'feeling good' could decide, drunkenness would be the supremely valid human experience. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-merely-feeling-good-could-decide-drunkenness-25090/
Chicago Style
James, William. "If merely 'feeling good' could decide, drunkenness would be the supremely valid human experience." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-merely-feeling-good-could-decide-drunkenness-25090/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If merely 'feeling good' could decide, drunkenness would be the supremely valid human experience." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-merely-feeling-good-could-decide-drunkenness-25090/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.









