"If merely 'feeling good' could decide, drunkenness would be the supremely valid human experience"
About this Quote
James lands the punch with a deliberately low example: drunkenness. He is not doing Victorian scolding so much as running a stress test on a tempting moral shortcut. If the criterion for truth, value, or meaning is simply "I feel better", then intoxication wins by knockout. The line is witty because it’s almost unfair; everyone knows the buzz can feel like relief, confidence, even revelation. That’s precisely why the example works. It forces the reader to admit that intensity of pleasure is an unreliable judge.
The subtext is a warning aimed at a culture (and a philosophical mood) eager to cash out big questions in private satisfaction. James is often associated with pragmatism and the legitimacy of lived experience, so this quip also functions as self-policing: pragmatism isn’t a license for hedonistic relativism. A belief can be "useful" in the narrow sense of mood management and still be corrosive in the broader sense of agency, relationships, and continuity of self. Drunkenness offers the caricature of a life optimized for immediate affect while eroding the very capacities that make a life cohere.
Context matters: James wrote in an era of industrial acceleration, new psychologies, and anxieties about modern willpower. He’s carving a lane between sterile rationalism and the seductions of pure feeling. The line insists that validity has to include consequences over time - not just the glow in the moment.
The subtext is a warning aimed at a culture (and a philosophical mood) eager to cash out big questions in private satisfaction. James is often associated with pragmatism and the legitimacy of lived experience, so this quip also functions as self-policing: pragmatism isn’t a license for hedonistic relativism. A belief can be "useful" in the narrow sense of mood management and still be corrosive in the broader sense of agency, relationships, and continuity of self. Drunkenness offers the caricature of a life optimized for immediate affect while eroding the very capacities that make a life cohere.
Context matters: James wrote in an era of industrial acceleration, new psychologies, and anxieties about modern willpower. He’s carving a lane between sterile rationalism and the seductions of pure feeling. The line insists that validity has to include consequences over time - not just the glow in the moment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List








