"If more people were actively engaged in advocating their positions I think we'd have a better society"
About this Quote
Jeb Bush is selling civic engagement as a kind of mild-mannered miracle drug: take one extra dose of advocacy and society gets “better.” The line works because it sounds indisputable while smuggling in a very particular theory of what’s gone wrong. It’s not corruption, inequality, or broken institutions; it’s insufficient participation. The problem is us, not the system. That’s a comforting diagnosis for a politician: it keeps the critique safely at the level of voter behavior and public attentiveness, where the cure is volunteering, debating, showing up.
The phrasing is careful in a way that reads like post-2010 Republican repositioning. “Actively engaged” signals a preference for grassroots energy without naming any ideology. “Advocating their positions” frames politics as a marketplace of opinions, not a fight over power. It’s civics as process, not politics as conflict. The benefit is broad appeal: everyone can hear their own side in it. The cost is that it flattens the asymmetry of modern advocacy, where some “positions” come with billionaire funding, think tanks, media ecosystems, and others come with a homemade sign and a day off work you can’t afford.
Context matters: the Bush brand was always the polite, managerial alternative to the party’s more incendiary performers. This sentence is classic Bush-era technocratic optimism dressed up as community spirit. It quietly scolds apathy while avoiding the harder question: what happens when more people get engaged, but they’re mobilized by misinformation, grievance, or outright anti-democratic aims? The quote’s subtext is faith in participation itself, as if the act of speaking up reliably produces wisdom. Recent history suggests engagement is powerful; it’s just not automatically virtuous.
The phrasing is careful in a way that reads like post-2010 Republican repositioning. “Actively engaged” signals a preference for grassroots energy without naming any ideology. “Advocating their positions” frames politics as a marketplace of opinions, not a fight over power. It’s civics as process, not politics as conflict. The benefit is broad appeal: everyone can hear their own side in it. The cost is that it flattens the asymmetry of modern advocacy, where some “positions” come with billionaire funding, think tanks, media ecosystems, and others come with a homemade sign and a day off work you can’t afford.
Context matters: the Bush brand was always the polite, managerial alternative to the party’s more incendiary performers. This sentence is classic Bush-era technocratic optimism dressed up as community spirit. It quietly scolds apathy while avoiding the harder question: what happens when more people get engaged, but they’re mobilized by misinformation, grievance, or outright anti-democratic aims? The quote’s subtext is faith in participation itself, as if the act of speaking up reliably produces wisdom. Recent history suggests engagement is powerful; it’s just not automatically virtuous.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jeb
Add to List





