"If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution"
About this Quote
Stevens isn’t complimenting poetry so much as interrogating the machinery of belief. The line pivots on a disarmingly pragmatic phrase - “rival it in distribution” - as if scripture were a product with unbeatable logistics. That’s the sting: the Bible’s cultural dominance isn’t framed as purely theological truth but as a perfected answer to human demand. Stevens, the insurance executive-poet, hears the world’s anxieties the way a modern institution does: as needs to be met, fears to be managed, aspirations to be supplied with form.
The intent is provocatively simple. Poetry, he argues, has the expressive range to compete with scripture if it dares to serve the same psychic functions: consolation, moral orientation, a story big enough to hold terror and desire. The subtext is more contentious. “If” signals both possibility and indictment. Poetry has often preferred aesthetic autonomy, private difficulty, and the pleasures of form; Stevens suggests that posture forfeits mass influence. He’s also quietly acknowledging a secularizing 20th century in which the old guarantees wobble. When traditional faith weakens, the question isn’t whether humans stop believing; it’s where the believing energy goes.
What makes the quote work is its cool, almost clinical tone. Stevens doesn’t argue against the Bible; he reverse-engineers its reach. He treats “distribution” as the visible tip of a deeper infrastructure: repetition, ritual, community, narrative clarity. The challenge he poses to poetry is not to preach, but to become culturally usable - to meet people at the pressure points where meaning is most urgently required.
The intent is provocatively simple. Poetry, he argues, has the expressive range to compete with scripture if it dares to serve the same psychic functions: consolation, moral orientation, a story big enough to hold terror and desire. The subtext is more contentious. “If” signals both possibility and indictment. Poetry has often preferred aesthetic autonomy, private difficulty, and the pleasures of form; Stevens suggests that posture forfeits mass influence. He’s also quietly acknowledging a secularizing 20th century in which the old guarantees wobble. When traditional faith weakens, the question isn’t whether humans stop believing; it’s where the believing energy goes.
What makes the quote work is its cool, almost clinical tone. Stevens doesn’t argue against the Bible; he reverse-engineers its reach. He treats “distribution” as the visible tip of a deeper infrastructure: repetition, ritual, community, narrative clarity. The challenge he poses to poetry is not to preach, but to become culturally usable - to meet people at the pressure points where meaning is most urgently required.
Quote Details
| Topic | Poetry |
|---|
More Quotes by Wallace
Add to List
