"If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs"
About this Quote
Stallman’s line is engineered to detonate a cozy assumption in tech culture: that innovation is automatically moral, and that creators are owed reverence simply for making something new. He flips the familiar “reward the inventors” argument back on itself, using the prim, almost legalistic “by the same token” to expose how selectively we apply our principles. If you’re going to justify power and profit as the natural payoff for ingenuity, you also have to own the coercion that can ride along with that power.
The intent isn’t to scold programmers for charging money or wanting credit. It’s to separate authorship from authority. Stallman’s subtext: software isn’t just a product; it’s infrastructure for modern life, a set of rules that users must live inside. When a program is designed to restrict copying, modification, or even understanding, it stops being a tool and starts behaving like a gatekeeper. “Punished” is the deliberately abrasive word here, not because Stallman literally wants a programmer jail, but because he wants the audience to feel the asymmetry: we celebrate creators when software expands human capability, yet we treat user lock-in and digital handcuffs as neutral business decisions.
Context matters. Coming out of the early hacker ethos and the birth of the Free Software movement, Stallman is arguing against proprietary software as a social harm, not a market preference. The quote works because it reframes “freedom” as a technical design choice with ethical consequences, and dares the industry to admit that restriction is not an accident of capitalism but a deliberate engineering goal.
The intent isn’t to scold programmers for charging money or wanting credit. It’s to separate authorship from authority. Stallman’s subtext: software isn’t just a product; it’s infrastructure for modern life, a set of rules that users must live inside. When a program is designed to restrict copying, modification, or even understanding, it stops being a tool and starts behaving like a gatekeeper. “Punished” is the deliberately abrasive word here, not because Stallman literally wants a programmer jail, but because he wants the audience to feel the asymmetry: we celebrate creators when software expands human capability, yet we treat user lock-in and digital handcuffs as neutral business decisions.
Context matters. Coming out of the early hacker ethos and the birth of the Free Software movement, Stallman is arguing against proprietary software as a social harm, not a market preference. The quote works because it reframes “freedom” as a technical design choice with ethical consequences, and dares the industry to admit that restriction is not an accident of capitalism but a deliberate engineering goal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List



