"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program"
About this Quote
Conditionals do a lot of moral laundering in this line. "If Saddam rejects peace" frames war as an imposed chore rather than a chosen strategy, shifting agency onto the adversary and pre-loading blame before any missile is launched. Clinton sets up a tidy binary - peace offered, force regrettably required - that makes escalation feel like enforcement of norms instead of a political decision with costs, uncertainties, and domestic calculations.
The key phrase is "our purpose is clear", a rhetorical move that substitutes clarity of intent for clarity of evidence. In the late 1990s, Iraq is cast not as a contained, degraded state under sanctions and inspections, but as a looming "program" - a word that implies continuity, technical competence, and inevitability. "Seriously diminish" is calibrated ambiguity: not total disarmament, not regime change, not open-ended occupation. It promises decisiveness without the burden of definitive outcomes, leaving room to claim success in a conflict where the metrics are necessarily classified, contested, or invisible to the public.
The subtext is managerial: this is a president speaking in the language of risk reduction, not crusade. He’s selling force as policy maintenance - like patching a system before it crashes - in a post-Cold War moment when American power is searching for mission and legitimacy. It also anticipates the criticism that military action is punitive or impulsive; by foregrounding "peace" and narrowing the objective to WMD, the line aims to look restrained, technocratic, and legally defensible. The irony is how elastic that restraint becomes once "threat" is the central noun: threats can always be updated, reinterpreted, and kept alive.
The key phrase is "our purpose is clear", a rhetorical move that substitutes clarity of intent for clarity of evidence. In the late 1990s, Iraq is cast not as a contained, degraded state under sanctions and inspections, but as a looming "program" - a word that implies continuity, technical competence, and inevitability. "Seriously diminish" is calibrated ambiguity: not total disarmament, not regime change, not open-ended occupation. It promises decisiveness without the burden of definitive outcomes, leaving room to claim success in a conflict where the metrics are necessarily classified, contested, or invisible to the public.
The subtext is managerial: this is a president speaking in the language of risk reduction, not crusade. He’s selling force as policy maintenance - like patching a system before it crashes - in a post-Cold War moment when American power is searching for mission and legitimacy. It also anticipates the criticism that military action is punitive or impulsive; by foregrounding "peace" and narrowing the objective to WMD, the line aims to look restrained, technocratic, and legally defensible. The irony is how elastic that restraint becomes once "threat" is the central noun: threats can always be updated, reinterpreted, and kept alive.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Statement by President William J. Clinton, Dec 16, 1998 — White House statement announcing military strikes on Iraq (contemporary report quotes line about diminishing the threat posed by Iraq's weapons-of-mass-destruction program). |
More Quotes by William
Add to List

