"If the British government is prepared to say that the Unionists will not have a veto over British government policy and that guns, vetoes and injustices will all be left outside the door, then there is no good reason why talks cannot take place in an appropriate atmosphere"
About this Quote
McGuinness is doing two things at once: offering an olive branch and tightening the screws. The sentence reads like a conditional, but it functions like a test of British seriousness. “If the British government is prepared to say…” isn’t polite throat-clearing; it’s a demand that London publicly reframe the rules of Northern Ireland’s political game.
The key word is “veto.” In the Northern Irish context, it’s shorthand for decades of Unionist dominance and the ability to block change by claiming to speak for “the community.” McGuinness is signaling that peace talks can’t be another exercise in managed stalemate where one side’s consent is treated as a permanent permission slip. He’s pushing the British state to declare itself an active actor, not a neutral referee beholden to Unionist red lines.
Then comes the deft rhetorical triad: “guns, vetoes and injustices.” He yokes paramilitary violence to constitutional obstruction and structural grievance, leveling the moral playing field. It’s a subtle piece of repositioning: republicans are expected to leave “guns” outside; Unionists and the British government are expected to leave their own instruments of coercion outside too, including policy bias and unequal treatment. “Appropriate atmosphere” is diplomatic language with teeth, implying that the atmosphere hasn’t been appropriate because power has been unevenly distributed.
The intent is not mere conciliation. It’s an attempt to define the terms of legitimacy before negotiations even begin: no side gets to carry its preferred weapon into the room, whether that weapon is a rifle, a procedural block, or a history of “injustices” quietly normalized as governance.
The key word is “veto.” In the Northern Irish context, it’s shorthand for decades of Unionist dominance and the ability to block change by claiming to speak for “the community.” McGuinness is signaling that peace talks can’t be another exercise in managed stalemate where one side’s consent is treated as a permanent permission slip. He’s pushing the British state to declare itself an active actor, not a neutral referee beholden to Unionist red lines.
Then comes the deft rhetorical triad: “guns, vetoes and injustices.” He yokes paramilitary violence to constitutional obstruction and structural grievance, leveling the moral playing field. It’s a subtle piece of repositioning: republicans are expected to leave “guns” outside; Unionists and the British government are expected to leave their own instruments of coercion outside too, including policy bias and unequal treatment. “Appropriate atmosphere” is diplomatic language with teeth, implying that the atmosphere hasn’t been appropriate because power has been unevenly distributed.
The intent is not mere conciliation. It’s an attempt to define the terms of legitimacy before negotiations even begin: no side gets to carry its preferred weapon into the room, whether that weapon is a rifle, a procedural block, or a history of “injustices” quietly normalized as governance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List
