"If the courts are making the decisions, it matters who the judge is and, of course, people are concerned with what is the bottom line"

In the quote by John Harrison, "If the courts are deciding, it matters who the judge is and, of course, individuals are interested in what is the bottom line", a number of crucial considerations about the judicial process and its effect on society are highlighted.

First of all, Harrison highlights the pivotal role that courts play in decision-making within a legal structure. When he states, "If the courts are deciding", he is acknowledging that, typically, the judiciary functions as the ultimate arbiter in conflicts, interpreting laws and setting precedents that can have significant ramifications. This statement recommends an acknowledgment of the judiciary's power not simply to fix private disagreements, but also to form societal norms through its interpretations and judgments.

The phrase "it matters who the judge is" points to the intrinsic subjectivity and uniqueness within the judicial process. Judges, in spite of striving for impartiality, bring their own perspectives, experiences, and analyses to the bench. This can lead to variations in rulings based upon who is presiding over a case. Judges' backgrounds, beliefs, and judicial viewpoints can influence their interpretations of the law and hence the outcomes of cases. This makes the selection or election of judges a matter of substantial public interest and political dispute, as those seated on the bench wield substantial impact over legal and social results.

Last but not least, Harrison's mention of "the bottom line" highlights the useful concerns and effects of court choices. While legal concepts and justice are vital, people and entities are typically most interested in how a choice impacts their instant interests, whether financially, socially, or otherwise. The "bottom line" refers to the end outcome or ultimate effect of court decisions on people's lives, underscoring the practical aspect of judicial outcomes.

In sum, Harrison's quote indicate the complex interaction in between judicial authority, the specific qualities of judges, and the concrete effects of legal choices, recommending that all these elements are essential factors to consider in comprehending the judicial procedure and its social effect.