"If the Negroes are to remain forever removed from the producing atmosphere, and the present discrimination continues, there will be nothing left for them to do"
About this Quote
Woodson’s sentence lands like a warning shot dressed up as plain arithmetic. Strip people of access to “the producing atmosphere” - not just jobs, but the habits, training, networks, and dignity that make work possible - and you don’t get a stable underclass. You get a pressure cooker. His phrasing is surgical: “removed” suggests an active, engineered separation, not an accident of the market. “Atmosphere” widens the indictment beyond a single employer or law to an entire ecosystem that decides who gets to be seen as useful.
The conditional structure matters. “If... and... there will be” reads less like moral pleading than cause-and-effect forecasting. Woodson is speaking as a historian: he’s seen what happens when a society blocks a group from legitimate routes to survival and status. The line implies the next step without naming it. If there’s “nothing left... to do,” the options turn ugly: dependency, informal economies, migration, protest, or revolt. The ellipsis is intentional; he forces the listener to complete the sentence with their own fear or conscience.
Contextually, this emerges from Woodson’s larger project: exposing how Jim Crow wasn’t merely social insult but economic design. He argues that discrimination doesn’t just harm Black people; it corrodes the nation by wasting talent and manufacturing instability. The bite is in the premise that productivity is a social gatekeeping mechanism. Deny entry long enough and you create the very “problem” segregationists claim to be managing.
The conditional structure matters. “If... and... there will be” reads less like moral pleading than cause-and-effect forecasting. Woodson is speaking as a historian: he’s seen what happens when a society blocks a group from legitimate routes to survival and status. The line implies the next step without naming it. If there’s “nothing left... to do,” the options turn ugly: dependency, informal economies, migration, protest, or revolt. The ellipsis is intentional; he forces the listener to complete the sentence with their own fear or conscience.
Contextually, this emerges from Woodson’s larger project: exposing how Jim Crow wasn’t merely social insult but economic design. He argues that discrimination doesn’t just harm Black people; it corrodes the nation by wasting talent and manufacturing instability. The bite is in the premise that productivity is a social gatekeeping mechanism. Deny entry long enough and you create the very “problem” segregationists claim to be managing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Carter
Add to List




