"If the stars should appear but one night every thousand years how man would marvel and stare"
About this Quote
Emerson’s line is a sly indictment disguised as wonder. He isn’t really talking about astronomy; he’s talking about attention economics before there was an economy of attention. Make the stars rare - ration beauty to once a millennium - and humans would suddenly become reverent, disciplined, even devout. The punchline is what we do now: we get the same extravagant sky nightly and treat it like background wallpaper.
The intent is classic Emerson: to shake the reader out of the trance of the habitual. Transcendentalism, at its best, doesn’t demand new miracles; it demands new eyesight. By imagining scarcity, he exposes how our sense of value is often a function of novelty rather than depth. We don’t fail to marvel because the world is un-marvelous; we fail because our perception has been domesticated by repetition.
There’s also a moral subtext: awe is not just a feeling, it’s a practice. Emerson implies that modern life trains us into a kind of spiritual laziness, where the extraordinary becomes invisible through overexposure. His hypothetical is a rebuke to a culture that confuses “common” with “cheap.”
Context matters: writing in a 19th-century America intoxicated by industry, expansion, and “progress,” Emerson keeps insisting that the most radical act is to notice what’s already here. The stars are a stand-in for everything we take for granted - nature, time, other people - and the line’s quiet force is that it makes our indifference look not neutral, but absurd.
The intent is classic Emerson: to shake the reader out of the trance of the habitual. Transcendentalism, at its best, doesn’t demand new miracles; it demands new eyesight. By imagining scarcity, he exposes how our sense of value is often a function of novelty rather than depth. We don’t fail to marvel because the world is un-marvelous; we fail because our perception has been domesticated by repetition.
There’s also a moral subtext: awe is not just a feeling, it’s a practice. Emerson implies that modern life trains us into a kind of spiritual laziness, where the extraordinary becomes invisible through overexposure. His hypothetical is a rebuke to a culture that confuses “common” with “cheap.”
Context matters: writing in a 19th-century America intoxicated by industry, expansion, and “progress,” Emerson keeps insisting that the most radical act is to notice what’s already here. The stars are a stand-in for everything we take for granted - nature, time, other people - and the line’s quiet force is that it makes our indifference look not neutral, but absurd.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Rejected source: Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám, and Salámán and Absál: Together... (Omar Khayyam, 1122)EBook #22535
Evidence: ay full the beauty of his face that rode high in a hundred thousand hearts yea when salámán was but halflance high Other candidates (2) A Time to Share (Norbert Weinberg, 2017) compilation95.0% Norbert Weinberg. Lest. We. Forget. It was Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) who said, “If the stars should appear but ... Ralph Waldo Emerson (Ralph Waldo Emerson) compilation70.6% t as truth introduction if the stars should appear one night in a thousand years how would men believe and adore an |
More Quotes by Ralph
Add to List





