"If the views I have expressed be right, we can think of our civilization evolving with the growth of knowledge from small wandering tribes to large settled law"
About this Quote
Civilization, in John Boyd Orr's telling, is less a miracle than a management problem: knowledge accumulates, people settle, and law expands to match the scale of human living. The sentence moves with a politician's careful conditional - "If the views I have expressed be right" - a hedge that doubles as an appeal to reason. He's not thunderbolting a creed; he's inviting assent, positioning his argument as pragmatic and evidence-based rather than ideological.
The subtext is progressive and stabilizing: wandering tribes suggest precariousness, scarcity, and constant negotiation; "large settled" societies imply surplus, institutions, and enforceable rules. Knowledge isn't just science here. It's literacy, administration, public health, agriculture - the toolkit that makes permanent settlement possible. Law, in turn, is framed not as repression but as the necessary architecture of scale: when communities grow beyond face-to-face trust, rules have to replace kinship.
Context matters. Orr was a twentieth-century public figure shaped by world wars, nutrition politics, and the rise of international governance (he helped shape early global food policy). His optimism about "growth of knowledge" reads like post-crisis faith in expertise: the idea that the horrors of modernity can be disciplined by better information and stronger institutions.
There's a quiet tension, too. By casting history as a one-way evolution from small to large, he compresses messy realities - imperialism, coercion, the costs of "settling". The line works because it sounds like common sense while smuggling in a political program: trust experts, build institutions, expand law, and call the result progress.
The subtext is progressive and stabilizing: wandering tribes suggest precariousness, scarcity, and constant negotiation; "large settled" societies imply surplus, institutions, and enforceable rules. Knowledge isn't just science here. It's literacy, administration, public health, agriculture - the toolkit that makes permanent settlement possible. Law, in turn, is framed not as repression but as the necessary architecture of scale: when communities grow beyond face-to-face trust, rules have to replace kinship.
Context matters. Orr was a twentieth-century public figure shaped by world wars, nutrition politics, and the rise of international governance (he helped shape early global food policy). His optimism about "growth of knowledge" reads like post-crisis faith in expertise: the idea that the horrors of modernity can be disciplined by better information and stronger institutions.
There's a quiet tension, too. By casting history as a one-way evolution from small to large, he compresses messy realities - imperialism, coercion, the costs of "settling". The line works because it sounds like common sense while smuggling in a political program: trust experts, build institutions, expand law, and call the result progress.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List






