"If there is no God, everything is permitted"
About this Quote
A grenade disguised as a syllogism, this line flatters the rational mind while quietly accusing it. Dostoevsky isn’t offering a tidy theological proof; he’s staging a psychological trap. The phrasing is absolute, almost legalistic: remove God, and the moral police clock out. That bluntness is the point. It forces the reader to test whether their ethics are convictions or merely habits propped up by fear of cosmic surveillance.
The subtext is less about God than about what replaces Him. If the divine judge disappears, do we discover freedom or emptiness? Dostoevsky, writing in a Russia jittery with radical politics, atheistic socialism, and imported European rationalism, worried that new ideologies promised liberation while smuggling in a colder kind of coercion. His novels keep returning to the same unsettling experiment: give a person permission, and see what they do with it. The most frightening outcome isn’t cartoon villainy; it’s the self-justifying mind, the way cruelty can dress itself up as logic, progress, necessity.
The line also works because it’s bait. Many modern readers instinctively object: of course morality can be secular. Dostoevsky anticipates that rebuttal and raises the stakes: even if you can build ethics without God, can you keep them binding when desire, suffering, and resentment start negotiating? The real question isn’t metaphysical. It’s existential: what, exactly, makes “not permitted” feel real when no one is watching?
The subtext is less about God than about what replaces Him. If the divine judge disappears, do we discover freedom or emptiness? Dostoevsky, writing in a Russia jittery with radical politics, atheistic socialism, and imported European rationalism, worried that new ideologies promised liberation while smuggling in a colder kind of coercion. His novels keep returning to the same unsettling experiment: give a person permission, and see what they do with it. The most frightening outcome isn’t cartoon villainy; it’s the self-justifying mind, the way cruelty can dress itself up as logic, progress, necessity.
The line also works because it’s bait. Many modern readers instinctively object: of course morality can be secular. Dostoevsky anticipates that rebuttal and raises the stakes: even if you can build ethics without God, can you keep them binding when desire, suffering, and resentment start negotiating? The real question isn’t metaphysical. It’s existential: what, exactly, makes “not permitted” feel real when no one is watching?
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Attributed to Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov (1880) — commonly quoted (paraphrased) as “If there is no God, everything is permitted” (line attributed to Ivan Karamazov). |
More Quotes by Fyodor
Add to List
