"If there were a major earthquake in Los Angeles, with bridges and highways and railroads and airports all shut down and huge buildings collapsing, I don't care how much planning you do, the first 72 hours is going to be chaotic"
About this Quote
Disaster planning sells certainty; Warren Rudman punctures that illusion with a hard deadline: the first 72 hours. The line works because it refuses the comforting fantasy that bureaucracy can pre-write order into catastrophe. By stacking infrastructure in a breathless list - bridges, highways, railroads, airports - he turns Los Angeles into what it really is in an emergency: a network city. Cut the links, and the metropolis doesn’t just slow down; it fractures. The image of “huge buildings collapsing” isn’t merely spectacle. It’s a reminder that the symbols of modern competence - vertical skylines, engineered mobility - become debris fields when the ground stops cooperating.
“I don’t care how much planning you do” sounds blunt, even dismissive, but the intent isn’t anti-preparedness. It’s a politician’s version of triage realism: planning matters, yet it cannot eliminate the human and logistical turbulence at the moment systems fail. The subtext is about expectations management. Rudman is inoculating the public against the outrage cycle that follows every crisis: why weren’t the roads open, why didn’t help arrive, why did communication collapse? By naming chaos as inevitable, he implicitly argues for resilience over perfection - for redundant systems, decentralized response, and public readiness to operate without the usual guarantees.
Contextually, this is late-20th-century governance learning to speak in the language of complex systems: interdependence, cascading failures, bottlenecks. It’s also a political act of honesty that carries risk. Admitting chaos is inevitable can sound like surrender. Rudman’s wager is that truth, delivered early, is its own form of preparedness.
“I don’t care how much planning you do” sounds blunt, even dismissive, but the intent isn’t anti-preparedness. It’s a politician’s version of triage realism: planning matters, yet it cannot eliminate the human and logistical turbulence at the moment systems fail. The subtext is about expectations management. Rudman is inoculating the public against the outrage cycle that follows every crisis: why weren’t the roads open, why didn’t help arrive, why did communication collapse? By naming chaos as inevitable, he implicitly argues for resilience over perfection - for redundant systems, decentralized response, and public readiness to operate without the usual guarantees.
Contextually, this is late-20th-century governance learning to speak in the language of complex systems: interdependence, cascading failures, bottlenecks. It’s also a political act of honesty that carries risk. Admitting chaos is inevitable can sound like surrender. Rudman’s wager is that truth, delivered early, is its own form of preparedness.
Quote Details
| Topic | Tough Times |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Warren
Add to List







