"If there's not any endgame, we're in quicksand. We take one more step, and we're still there, and there's no way out"
About this Quote
Quicksand is an old Hollywood menace, the kind that kills you slowly while you panic in public. Richard Shelby borrows it for politics because it does two jobs at once: it makes stasis feel like danger, and it turns incremental action into recklessness. “If there’s not any endgame” is the tell. He isn’t warning against action; he’s warning against action without a narratable finish line. That’s not strategy-speak so much as legitimacy-speak: policies and wars don’t just need objectives, they need endings that can be sold as closure.
The subtext is a critique of open-ended commitments, the kind that become permanent because no one wants to admit they’re stuck. “We take one more step” frames each additional vote, dollar, or deployment as a moral risk, not a bureaucratic adjustment. It’s a way of shifting responsibility from the original decision to the people asked to sustain it: you may not have started this, but you’re the one sinking it deeper.
Shelby’s political context makes the metaphor even sharper. As a long-serving senator and a defense hawk with occasional flashes of skepticism about nation-building, he’s speaking to a Washington habit: treating momentum as a plan. The quote aims to discipline that habit by demanding an “endgame” before the next appropriation or escalation. It’s also self-protective rhetoric: if the project fails, the blame belongs to the leaders who couldn’t define the exit, not to the lawmakers who refused “one more step.”
The subtext is a critique of open-ended commitments, the kind that become permanent because no one wants to admit they’re stuck. “We take one more step” frames each additional vote, dollar, or deployment as a moral risk, not a bureaucratic adjustment. It’s a way of shifting responsibility from the original decision to the people asked to sustain it: you may not have started this, but you’re the one sinking it deeper.
Shelby’s political context makes the metaphor even sharper. As a long-serving senator and a defense hawk with occasional flashes of skepticism about nation-building, he’s speaking to a Washington habit: treating momentum as a plan. The quote aims to discipline that habit by demanding an “endgame” before the next appropriation or escalation. It’s also self-protective rhetoric: if the project fails, the blame belongs to the leaders who couldn’t define the exit, not to the lawmakers who refused “one more step.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List







