"If they are opposed to abortion, they should be for preventing unintended pregnancies"
About this Quote
The line reframes the abortion debate as a practical call for consistency. If the stated goal is fewer abortions, then the most direct and humane path is to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies that lead to them. That means supporting proven measures like comprehensive sex education, affordable and accessible contraception, and robust reproductive healthcare. The message is less a rebuke than a challenge to align moral stances with effective policy.
Louise Slaughter, a longtime congresswoman and advocate for womens health, understood how rhetoric often drifts away from outcomes. Many who oppose abortion also resist comprehensive sex education or contraceptive access, positions that research shows lead to higher rates of unintended pregnancy. Abstinence-only education and barriers to birth control do not eliminate sexual activity; they simply make it riskier. By shifting the focus to prevention, the argument invites common ground: people across the spectrum can agree that fewer unintended pregnancies is a worthy aim.
The logic is grounded in evidence. Societies that expand access to contraception and provide fact-based education tend to see lower teen pregnancy and abortion rates. When cost and access barriers fall, especially for long-acting reversible contraceptives, unintended pregnancies decline. Emphasizing prevention also recognizes the broader realities of people’s lives, including economic insecurity, gaps in healthcare, and the uneven burden placed on women.
There is a moral claim here too: responsibility should be measured not by punitive restrictions but by the willingness to support what actually works. A politics that condemns abortion while undermining prevention turns principle into paradox. A politics that marries conviction with prevention honors both the complexity of the issue and the dignity of those affected by it. Slaughter’s line urges replacing symbolic battles with practical compassion, aligning values with results and moving the debate from punishment to prevention and care.
Louise Slaughter, a longtime congresswoman and advocate for womens health, understood how rhetoric often drifts away from outcomes. Many who oppose abortion also resist comprehensive sex education or contraceptive access, positions that research shows lead to higher rates of unintended pregnancy. Abstinence-only education and barriers to birth control do not eliminate sexual activity; they simply make it riskier. By shifting the focus to prevention, the argument invites common ground: people across the spectrum can agree that fewer unintended pregnancies is a worthy aim.
The logic is grounded in evidence. Societies that expand access to contraception and provide fact-based education tend to see lower teen pregnancy and abortion rates. When cost and access barriers fall, especially for long-acting reversible contraceptives, unintended pregnancies decline. Emphasizing prevention also recognizes the broader realities of people’s lives, including economic insecurity, gaps in healthcare, and the uneven burden placed on women.
There is a moral claim here too: responsibility should be measured not by punitive restrictions but by the willingness to support what actually works. A politics that condemns abortion while undermining prevention turns principle into paradox. A politics that marries conviction with prevention honors both the complexity of the issue and the dignity of those affected by it. Slaughter’s line urges replacing symbolic battles with practical compassion, aligning values with results and moving the debate from punishment to prevention and care.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Louise
Add to List
