"If this work seems so threatening, this is because it isn't simply eccentric or strange, but competent, rigorously argued, and carrying conviction"
About this Quote
Threat doesn’t always announce itself with a slogan; sometimes it arrives wearing footnotes. Derrida’s line is a sly reversal of how institutions typically neutralize difficult ideas: by dismissing them as “eccentric” or “strange,” a polite cordon sanitaire that lets power avoid engaging on the merits. He’s pointing to a different kind of danger, the kind that can’t be quarantined by ridicule because it meets the academy on its own battlefield - competence, rigor, persuasion - and still destabilizes the rules of the game.
The intent is defensive and prosecutorial at once. Derrida anticipates the familiar charge leveled at deconstruction: that it’s obscure, merely fashionable, a decadent French parlor trick. His counterclaim is almost baiting: if you feel threatened, it’s not because I’m incoherent; it’s because the argument holds. The subtext is an indictment of gatekeeping masquerading as taste. “Threatening” here names an anxiety about authority: when a critique is well-made, the problem isn’t the critic’s style, it’s what the critique reveals about the foundations - how “reason,” “clarity,” and “objectivity” have been policed as cultural credentials.
Context matters: Derrida’s career unfolded amid fierce Anglo-American skepticism toward continental theory and, later, the U.S. “theory wars.” This sentence reads like a preemptive strike against bad-faith reception. It’s also a rhetorical trap: to call the work threatening is to concede it has force. He reframes hostility as testimony, turning scandal into evidence that the critique touched something real.
The intent is defensive and prosecutorial at once. Derrida anticipates the familiar charge leveled at deconstruction: that it’s obscure, merely fashionable, a decadent French parlor trick. His counterclaim is almost baiting: if you feel threatened, it’s not because I’m incoherent; it’s because the argument holds. The subtext is an indictment of gatekeeping masquerading as taste. “Threatening” here names an anxiety about authority: when a critique is well-made, the problem isn’t the critic’s style, it’s what the critique reveals about the foundations - how “reason,” “clarity,” and “objectivity” have been policed as cultural credentials.
Context matters: Derrida’s career unfolded amid fierce Anglo-American skepticism toward continental theory and, later, the U.S. “theory wars.” This sentence reads like a preemptive strike against bad-faith reception. It’s also a rhetorical trap: to call the work threatening is to concede it has force. He reframes hostility as testimony, turning scandal into evidence that the critique touched something real.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Jacques
Add to List


