"If we are not represented, we are slaves"
About this Quote
The intent is tactical escalation. In the 1760s, colonists were fighting writs of assistance and new revenue measures that treated them as subjects to be managed rather than citizens with standing. Otis reframes the dispute from “how much tax” to “what is a person.” Representation becomes the bright line between a polity and a plantation. That’s why the word “slaves” lands: it’s meant to shame British authority by yoking imperial governance to the most reviled form of unfreedom in the Anglo-American imagination.
The subtext is even sharper: rights don’t trickle down from benevolent rulers; they are secured by institutional leverage. Otis isn’t pleading for kindness. He’s warning that a system that extracts without listening is training people to see themselves as conquered. The rhetorical gamble is obvious, too. In a society already built on actual slavery, the metaphor exposes a hypocrisy it doesn’t fully confront. It weaponizes the language of bondage to defend liberty for some, while leaving open the question of who, exactly, counts as “we.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Otis, James. (2026, January 17). If we are not represented, we are slaves. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-are-not-represented-we-are-slaves-65162/
Chicago Style
Otis, James. "If we are not represented, we are slaves." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-are-not-represented-we-are-slaves-65162/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If we are not represented, we are slaves." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-are-not-represented-we-are-slaves-65162/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.











