"If we can modernise the workforce, make them better qualified, have this framework of qualifications, then I think they have a very good case for more money"
About this Quote
Modernisation arrives here as a kind of moral solvent: upgrade the worker, and the argument for higher pay supposedly cleans itself. Estelle Morris wraps a contentious political move in the language of common sense. Who could object to “better qualified”? But the line quietly relocates responsibility for wage stagnation away from employers, markets, or government choices and onto workers’ credentials. It’s a neat rhetorical pivot: not “people deserve more,” but “people can make a case for more,” as if pay rises are a courtroom drama where the right paperwork wins.
The phrase “framework of qualifications” is the giveaway. This isn’t just about skills; it’s about standardisation, legibility, and control. Frameworks let governments measure, fund, and audit. They also let employers screen and rank. In that world, pay becomes conditional on being certified in the correct way, by the correct system, at the correct time. The promise of “more money” functions as the carrot that makes the bureaucracy feel like empowerment.
Context matters: New Labour-era politics leaned hard on “upskilling” as the answer to inequality, pairing aspiration with employability. Morris’s intent is pragmatic - sell reform, justify investment in training, and reassure taxpayers that higher wages won’t be a blank cheque. The subtext is more austere: wages are not a right of work but a reward for employability as defined by the state and the market. It’s optimistic in tone, but conditional in structure, and that condition is doing most of the ideological work.
The phrase “framework of qualifications” is the giveaway. This isn’t just about skills; it’s about standardisation, legibility, and control. Frameworks let governments measure, fund, and audit. They also let employers screen and rank. In that world, pay becomes conditional on being certified in the correct way, by the correct system, at the correct time. The promise of “more money” functions as the carrot that makes the bureaucracy feel like empowerment.
Context matters: New Labour-era politics leaned hard on “upskilling” as the answer to inequality, pairing aspiration with employability. Morris’s intent is pragmatic - sell reform, justify investment in training, and reassure taxpayers that higher wages won’t be a blank cheque. The subtext is more austere: wages are not a right of work but a reward for employability as defined by the state and the market. It’s optimistic in tone, but conditional in structure, and that condition is doing most of the ideological work.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|
More Quotes by Estelle
Add to List
