"If we cannot agree, then at least we ought to move on"
About this Quote
The subtext is procedural pressure dressed up as practicality. “Move on” sounds like emotional maturity, but in legislative life it’s also a tactic: stop relitigating, stop grandstanding, take the imperfect vote, clear the calendar. It quietly shifts the burden onto holdouts. If you keep fighting, you’re not principled; you’re obstructing forward motion. That’s a powerful reframing in a system where delay can be a weapon and where “doing nothing” is often the easiest thing to justify.
Contextually, Nelson’s career sits in the late-20th/early-21st-century Senate, when bipartisan bargaining became both rarer and more theatrical. Moderates like him were routinely cast as dealmakers or spoilers depending on the day. This line is crafted for that narrow middle lane: it reassures voters tired of constant conflict while signaling to colleagues that time is the scarce resource. It’s not inspirational so much as managerial, the rhetoric of governance when consensus has become a luxury item.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Nelson, Ben. (2026, January 17). If we cannot agree, then at least we ought to move on. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-cannot-agree-then-at-least-we-ought-to-move-37194/
Chicago Style
Nelson, Ben. "If we cannot agree, then at least we ought to move on." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-cannot-agree-then-at-least-we-ought-to-move-37194/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If we cannot agree, then at least we ought to move on." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-cannot-agree-then-at-least-we-ought-to-move-37194/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



