"If we can't begin to agree on fundamentals, such as the elimination of the most abusive forms of child labor, then we really are not ready to march forward into the future"
About this Quote
The line is a velvet-gloved ultimatum: if we can’t even unite around the most basic moral red lines, don’t bother pretending we’re a serious society. Alexis Herman frames “fundamentals” the way a seasoned public servant does when she’s trying to build a coalition without surrendering the point. She doesn’t argue child labor is wrong; she assumes it’s self-evident, then uses that assumption as a stress test for political credibility.
The phrase “begin to agree” is doing quiet work. It lowers the bar to something almost embarrassingly attainable, which makes disagreement look not just callous but backward. “The most abusive forms” is also strategic. Herman isn’t demanding instant perfection or a sweeping ideological conversion; she’s narrowing the target to the most indefensible cases, inviting even skeptics to sign on. If they won’t, the implication is clear: the obstacle isn’t policy complexity, it’s moral failure or captured interests.
Then comes the real sting: “not ready to march forward into the future.” It borrows the rhetoric of progress - a national myth Americans love - and turns it into conditional membership. The subtext is that modernization isn’t measured by GDP, tech, or global competitiveness; it’s measured by whether adults can protect children when doing so inconveniences markets.
Contextually, this reads like late-20th-century labor politics: globalization accelerating, supply chains stretching, and “growth” increasingly decoupled from worker dignity. Herman’s intent is to set a minimal, non-negotiable floor - and to shame the politics that treats that floor as optional.
The phrase “begin to agree” is doing quiet work. It lowers the bar to something almost embarrassingly attainable, which makes disagreement look not just callous but backward. “The most abusive forms” is also strategic. Herman isn’t demanding instant perfection or a sweeping ideological conversion; she’s narrowing the target to the most indefensible cases, inviting even skeptics to sign on. If they won’t, the implication is clear: the obstacle isn’t policy complexity, it’s moral failure or captured interests.
Then comes the real sting: “not ready to march forward into the future.” It borrows the rhetoric of progress - a national myth Americans love - and turns it into conditional membership. The subtext is that modernization isn’t measured by GDP, tech, or global competitiveness; it’s measured by whether adults can protect children when doing so inconveniences markets.
Contextually, this reads like late-20th-century labor politics: globalization accelerating, supply chains stretching, and “growth” increasingly decoupled from worker dignity. Herman’s intent is to set a minimal, non-negotiable floor - and to shame the politics that treats that floor as optional.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Alexis
Add to List







