"If we do discover a complete theory, it should be in time understandable in broad principle by everyone. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people be able to take part in the discussion of why we and the universe exist"
About this Quote
Hawking is selling a radical idea with a disarmingly democratic smile: the deepest laws of reality shouldn’t belong exclusively to a priesthood of experts. Coming from a physicist whose work helped make cosmology feel like part of public culture, this is both outreach and provocation. He isn’t promising that everyone will be able to do the math. He’s promising that the meaning of the math could become common property.
The phrase “complete theory” carries the faint echo of physics’ old holy grail, a final framework that unifies gravity with quantum mechanics. But Hawking’s real move is rhetorical: he smuggles a philosophical claim inside a scientific aspiration. “Understandable in broad principle” lowers the gate just enough to invite non-specialists in, while still preserving the authority of a scientific result. It’s a vision of intellectual citizenship, where comprehension isn’t total mastery but informed participation.
Then comes the subtextual pivot: “why we and the universe exist.” That “why” is doing a lot of work. Hawking, famously skeptical of metaphysical explanations, nonetheless recognizes that scientific answers inevitably collide with existential hunger. He reframes that hunger as a legitimate public conversation rather than a private spiritual one. The context is late-20th-century “big questions” physics, when popular science became a mass medium and the stakes of cosmology were culturally inflated. Hawking’s line flatters “ordinary people,” but it also challenges them: if the universe can be explained, the responsibility to think about its implications no longer belongs to anyone else.
The phrase “complete theory” carries the faint echo of physics’ old holy grail, a final framework that unifies gravity with quantum mechanics. But Hawking’s real move is rhetorical: he smuggles a philosophical claim inside a scientific aspiration. “Understandable in broad principle” lowers the gate just enough to invite non-specialists in, while still preserving the authority of a scientific result. It’s a vision of intellectual citizenship, where comprehension isn’t total mastery but informed participation.
Then comes the subtextual pivot: “why we and the universe exist.” That “why” is doing a lot of work. Hawking, famously skeptical of metaphysical explanations, nonetheless recognizes that scientific answers inevitably collide with existential hunger. He reframes that hunger as a legitimate public conversation rather than a private spiritual one. The context is late-20th-century “big questions” physics, when popular science became a mass medium and the stakes of cosmology were culturally inflated. Hawking’s line flatters “ordinary people,” but it also challenges them: if the universe can be explained, the responsibility to think about its implications no longer belongs to anyone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Meaning of Life |
|---|---|
| Source | A Brief History of Time — Stephen Hawking, 1988 (commonly cited source for this passage). |
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List





