"If we do what we think is right, not try to point-score, people will begin to trust us"
About this Quote
Trust is framed here less as a moral reward than as a political technology: do the right thing, stop playing for applause, and credibility accumulates. Maude’s phrasing is deceptively plain, but it’s doing a lot of reputational cleanup work. The key move is the contrast between “what we think is right” and “point-score,” a jab at the Westminster habit of treating governance as permanent cross-examination. “Point-score” evokes the tribal dopamine hit of a clever line in the chamber or a headline-friendly zinger; it’s politics as sport, where the immediate win matters more than the long-term record.
The subtext is that public cynicism isn’t irrational or media-manufactured; it’s earned. By positioning trust as something “people will begin” to grant, Maude admits it’s currently absent and that it returns only gradually. That little “begin” is a tacit concession to scandal fatigue, spin, and the sense that politicians are incentivized to perform rather than decide.
Context matters because Maude isn’t speaking as an outsider scolding the system; he’s a product of it, and that gives the line an almost managerial tone. “If we do” reads like an internal memo to colleagues: stop feeding the short-term cycle, prioritize judgments you can defend when the cameras are gone. It’s also a preemptive defense against accusations of opportunism: the speaker aligns himself with seriousness, implying that opponents are the ones chasing points. The brilliance is that it flatters voters as referees while quietly asking for patience.
The subtext is that public cynicism isn’t irrational or media-manufactured; it’s earned. By positioning trust as something “people will begin” to grant, Maude admits it’s currently absent and that it returns only gradually. That little “begin” is a tacit concession to scandal fatigue, spin, and the sense that politicians are incentivized to perform rather than decide.
Context matters because Maude isn’t speaking as an outsider scolding the system; he’s a product of it, and that gives the line an almost managerial tone. “If we do” reads like an internal memo to colleagues: stop feeding the short-term cycle, prioritize judgments you can defend when the cameras are gone. It’s also a preemptive defense against accusations of opportunism: the speaker aligns himself with seriousness, implying that opponents are the ones chasing points. The brilliance is that it flatters voters as referees while quietly asking for patience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Francis
Add to List








