"If we don't do it, somebody else will. The Chinese, the Europeans and the Japanese all have the goal of going to the moon. Certainly we don't want to wake up and see that they have a base there before we do"
About this Quote
Scarcity is doing all the work here: not scarcity of resources, but scarcity of prestige. Bart Gordon frames the moon less as a scientific frontier than as a scoreboard, where the worst outcome isn’t failure but arriving second. The opening clause, “If we don’t do it, somebody else will,” is political judo: it turns an optional, expensive ambition into a defensive necessity. The verb “wake up” sells the threat as sudden and humiliating, like the nation slept through its own eclipse.
The subtext is classic post-Cold War space rhetoric updated for a multipolar world. Instead of “the Soviets,” we get a tidy roster of rivals - Chinese, Europeans, Japanese - bundled into a single pressure wave. That list isn’t an intelligence assessment; it’s coalition-building at home. By naming multiple competitors, Gordon widens the circle of anxiety and, with it, the coalition for funding: industry, defense hawks, and districts tied to NASA contracts all hear a reason to spend.
“Base” is the key word. It smuggles military and economic implications into a line that never says “weapons” or “mining.” A base implies permanence, infrastructure, and control of access - the suggestion that the moon could become a strategic high ground or a gated resource. Contextually, this is the era when NASA’s human spaceflight program was looking for a clear next act after Shuttle and station politics: a narrative that could survive budget fights. Gordon offers one that Congress understands instantly: not wonder, but leverage.
The subtext is classic post-Cold War space rhetoric updated for a multipolar world. Instead of “the Soviets,” we get a tidy roster of rivals - Chinese, Europeans, Japanese - bundled into a single pressure wave. That list isn’t an intelligence assessment; it’s coalition-building at home. By naming multiple competitors, Gordon widens the circle of anxiety and, with it, the coalition for funding: industry, defense hawks, and districts tied to NASA contracts all hear a reason to spend.
“Base” is the key word. It smuggles military and economic implications into a line that never says “weapons” or “mining.” A base implies permanence, infrastructure, and control of access - the suggestion that the moon could become a strategic high ground or a gated resource. Contextually, this is the era when NASA’s human spaceflight program was looking for a clear next act after Shuttle and station politics: a narrative that could survive budget fights. Gordon offers one that Congress understands instantly: not wonder, but leverage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Bart
Add to List






