"If we had 3 million exhibitionists and only one voyeur, nobody could make any money"
About this Quote
The specific intent is to puncture the romantic story we tell ourselves about expression. We like to frame public self-revelation as courage, authenticity, art. Brooks reframes it as a transaction: attention is currency, and the only thing that makes “exposure” valuable is someone else’s willingness to watch. That’s the subtext with teeth: the exhibitor’s “freedom” is quietly dependent on the voyeur’s appetite.
Contextually, it fits Brooks’s persona and era: a comic voice shaped by late-20th-century media saturation, where everyone is auditioning for relevance and the camera is always metaphorically on. Long before “content creator” became a job title, he’s sketching the economic reality behind it. If everyone is performing, performance stops being special; it becomes noise. The bottleneck isn’t talent or nerve, it’s attention.
Underneath the punchline is a sly critique of a culture that confuses visibility with value. If nobody can make any money, maybe the more unsettling implication is that “making money” was the point all along.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Brooks, Albert. (2026, January 16). If we had 3 million exhibitionists and only one voyeur, nobody could make any money. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-had-3-million-exhibitionists-and-only-one-133236/
Chicago Style
Brooks, Albert. "If we had 3 million exhibitionists and only one voyeur, nobody could make any money." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-had-3-million-exhibitionists-and-only-one-133236/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If we had 3 million exhibitionists and only one voyeur, nobody could make any money." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-we-had-3-million-exhibitionists-and-only-one-133236/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2026.



