"If we justify war, it is because all peoples always justify the traits of which they find themselves possessed, not because war will bear an objective examination of its merits"
About this Quote
Benedict’s line lands like a calm lab report that happens to indict civilization. Her intent isn’t to argue the ethics of any particular conflict; it’s to expose the psychology that makes ethics feel optional once a society has already decided who it is. The pivot is devastatingly simple: we don’t justify war because it stands up to scrutiny, we justify it because it’s ours. War becomes less a policy choice than a mirror, and people, Benedict suggests, are famously tender about their reflections.
The subtext is cultural relativism sharpened into a warning. Benedict, a major figure in American anthropology, spent her career showing that what communities call “normal” is often just “familiar,” wrapped in moral language. Here she applies that insight to nationalism and militarism: justification operates as a self-soothing ritual. The “objective examination” she references is the ideal of rational, universal evaluation - and her point is that societies frequently stage that ideal as theater after the fact. The verdict precedes the trial.
Context matters. Writing in the shadow of two world wars and amid the rise of mass propaganda, Benedict is pushing back against the modern fantasy that enlightened nations wage enlightened wars. Her scientist’s posture - cool, categorical, “all peoples” - is also rhetorical strategy: it denies the reader the comfort of exceptionalism. No one gets to outsource this to “barbarians” or “the past.” The line works because it reframes moral reasoning as identity maintenance, suggesting that the most dangerous stories a culture tells are the ones that flatter its self-image while licensing its violence.
The subtext is cultural relativism sharpened into a warning. Benedict, a major figure in American anthropology, spent her career showing that what communities call “normal” is often just “familiar,” wrapped in moral language. Here she applies that insight to nationalism and militarism: justification operates as a self-soothing ritual. The “objective examination” she references is the ideal of rational, universal evaluation - and her point is that societies frequently stage that ideal as theater after the fact. The verdict precedes the trial.
Context matters. Writing in the shadow of two world wars and amid the rise of mass propaganda, Benedict is pushing back against the modern fantasy that enlightened nations wage enlightened wars. Her scientist’s posture - cool, categorical, “all peoples” - is also rhetorical strategy: it denies the reader the comfort of exceptionalism. No one gets to outsource this to “barbarians” or “the past.” The line works because it reframes moral reasoning as identity maintenance, suggesting that the most dangerous stories a culture tells are the ones that flatter its self-image while licensing its violence.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Ruth
Add to List
