"If we notice a few errors in the work of a proven master, we may and even will often be correct; if we believe, however, that he is completely and utterly mistaken, we are in danger of missing his entire concept"
About this Quote
Grillparzer slips a quiet warning into what sounds like generous praise: criticism is easiest when it’s local. You can spot a misstep, a clumsy line, a structural wobble in a “proven master” and even be right. The trap is scale. The moment your critique balloons into “he’s utterly mistaken,” you’re no longer editing; you’re rejecting the operating system.
The subtext is less about protecting geniuses than about disciplining the critic’s ego. Total dismissal feels clean, decisive, morally satisfying. It also flatters the reader into thinking they stand outside the work’s logic, that they can judge without first submitting to the artist’s terms. Grillparzer suggests the opposite: serious engagement requires a temporary consent, a willingness to inhabit the concept long enough to see what it’s trying to solve.
Context matters here. As a 19th-century poet and dramatist in the Austro-Hungarian world, Grillparzer lived amid aesthetic factionalism: classicists vs. romantics, national projects vs. cosmopolitan taste, gatekeepers policing what “art” should be. His line reads like a rebuttal to ideological criticism that treats artworks as arguments to be defeated rather than structures to be understood.
It’s also a sly defense of complexity. Masters don’t earn that title by being mistake-proof; they earn it by building coherent worlds. You can call out a cracked tile, but if you declare the whole cathedral wrong, you may be missing the architecture.
The subtext is less about protecting geniuses than about disciplining the critic’s ego. Total dismissal feels clean, decisive, morally satisfying. It also flatters the reader into thinking they stand outside the work’s logic, that they can judge without first submitting to the artist’s terms. Grillparzer suggests the opposite: serious engagement requires a temporary consent, a willingness to inhabit the concept long enough to see what it’s trying to solve.
Context matters here. As a 19th-century poet and dramatist in the Austro-Hungarian world, Grillparzer lived amid aesthetic factionalism: classicists vs. romantics, national projects vs. cosmopolitan taste, gatekeepers policing what “art” should be. His line reads like a rebuttal to ideological criticism that treats artworks as arguments to be defeated rather than structures to be understood.
It’s also a sly defense of complexity. Masters don’t earn that title by being mistake-proof; they earn it by building coherent worlds. You can call out a cracked tile, but if you declare the whole cathedral wrong, you may be missing the architecture.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Franz
Add to List
