"If we openly declare what is wrong with us, what is our deepest need, then perhaps the death and despair will by degrees disappear"
About this Quote
Priestley writes like a man staring down the wreckage and refusing the easy narcotic of stoicism. The line is built on a risky wager: that confession is not merely catharsis but social technology. “Openly declare” is the pressure point. He’s not talking about private journaling or polite admissions in the confessional booth; he’s arguing for public speech, the kind that turns a personal wound into a shared fact. In a culture trained to treat need as weakness, he frames candor as civic hygiene.
The subtext is a critique of British emotional discipline and the political habits that ride on it. When a society can’t name its hunger - for security, dignity, purpose, peace - it becomes easy to misdirect that hunger into scapegoating, militarism, or quiet self-destruction. “Death and despair” aren’t only literal; they’re the background radiation of repression, the slow corrosion that shows up as numbness, bitterness, or a national mood that feels like fog.
His most Priestley-esque move is the modest “perhaps” and the incremental “by degrees.” No revolutionary crescendo, no miracle cure. He offers a pragmatic humanism: honesty as a gradual solvent. That restraint is rhetorical strategy. It makes the promise believable, even in the shadow of war, austerity, and the mid-century sense that modern life had outrun moral vocabulary.
The intent, then, is quietly radical: to make need speakable so it can become solvable - not by individual willpower alone, but by collective recognition.
The subtext is a critique of British emotional discipline and the political habits that ride on it. When a society can’t name its hunger - for security, dignity, purpose, peace - it becomes easy to misdirect that hunger into scapegoating, militarism, or quiet self-destruction. “Death and despair” aren’t only literal; they’re the background radiation of repression, the slow corrosion that shows up as numbness, bitterness, or a national mood that feels like fog.
His most Priestley-esque move is the modest “perhaps” and the incremental “by degrees.” No revolutionary crescendo, no miracle cure. He offers a pragmatic humanism: honesty as a gradual solvent. That restraint is rhetorical strategy. It makes the promise believable, even in the shadow of war, austerity, and the mid-century sense that modern life had outrun moral vocabulary.
The intent, then, is quietly radical: to make need speakable so it can become solvable - not by individual willpower alone, but by collective recognition.
Quote Details
| Topic | Mental Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Priestley
Add to List
