"If we resist our passions, it is more due to their weakness than our strength"
About this Quote
Self-control gets demoted here from heroic virtue to lucky timing. La Rochefoucauld, that patron saint of elegant disillusionment, insists that what we call “resisting our passions” often isn’t moral muscle at all; it’s the passion itself arriving underfed, late, or already distracted by some rival appetite. The sting is deliberate. He’s not praising weakness, he’s puncturing the flattering story we tell about ourselves when we behave: that we “overcame” desire through character.
The subtext is classic Rochefoucauld: vanity is the real engine, and virtue is frequently vanity in costume. If I don’t lash out, maybe it’s not because I’m magnanimous but because I’m tired, afraid of consequences, or simply not that invested. If I don’t cheat, maybe it’s because the opportunity didn’t tempt me enough. The line forces a humiliating audit of our motives, where ethical identity becomes less a stable trait than a shifting balance of impulses, incentives, and social pressure.
Context sharpens the cynicism. Writing from the salons and court politics of 17th-century France, La Rochefoucauld watched reputations manufactured and pieties performed. In that world, “strength” was often a public-facing narrative, while private desire and self-interest did the real work. His maxim reads like a corrective to courtly moralism: don’t confuse the absence of scandal with the presence of virtue.
What makes it work is its inversion. He takes a comforting moral hierarchy (strength over passion) and flips the causal arrow, leaving the reader with an unsettling possibility: your best behavior might be less your triumph than your luck.
The subtext is classic Rochefoucauld: vanity is the real engine, and virtue is frequently vanity in costume. If I don’t lash out, maybe it’s not because I’m magnanimous but because I’m tired, afraid of consequences, or simply not that invested. If I don’t cheat, maybe it’s because the opportunity didn’t tempt me enough. The line forces a humiliating audit of our motives, where ethical identity becomes less a stable trait than a shifting balance of impulses, incentives, and social pressure.
Context sharpens the cynicism. Writing from the salons and court politics of 17th-century France, La Rochefoucauld watched reputations manufactured and pieties performed. In that world, “strength” was often a public-facing narrative, while private desire and self-interest did the real work. His maxim reads like a corrective to courtly moralism: don’t confuse the absence of scandal with the presence of virtue.
What makes it work is its inversion. He takes a comforting moral hierarchy (strength over passion) and flips the causal arrow, leaving the reader with an unsettling possibility: your best behavior might be less your triumph than your luck.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Francois
Add to List
