"If we were faultless we should not be so much annoyed by the defects of those with whom we associate"
About this Quote
Annoyance, Fenelon implies, is rarely just about the other person. It’s a flare-up of self-knowledge we don’t want to feel. The line works because it flips a familiar moral posture: the irritation that feels like righteous discernment becomes evidence of our own unfinished work. If we were truly “faultless” - not merely polite, but inwardly settled - other people’s defects would register as facts, not provocations. The sting is diagnostic.
As a clergyman and spiritual writer in Catholic France, Fenelon is speaking into a culture obsessed with manners, hierarchy, and the daily friction of court and community life. His audience would have known the performance of virtue: appearing patient while quietly compiling a ledger of others’ shortcomings. He punctures that hypocrisy without sounding like a scold. The conditional “If we were faultless” doesn’t accuse; it invites self-examination. It’s pastoral rhetoric with a razor hidden in the velvet.
The subtext is Augustinian: pride makes us allergic to weakness, especially weakness that resembles our own. The defects of “those with whom we associate” land hardest because they’re close enough to threaten our self-image, our comfort, our control. Fenelon’s intent isn’t to excuse bad behavior or demand passive tolerance; it’s to reassign the locus of moral drama. The real battle isn’t winning the argument at dinner. It’s noticing what your irritation reveals about the parts of you still negotiating with humility.
As a clergyman and spiritual writer in Catholic France, Fenelon is speaking into a culture obsessed with manners, hierarchy, and the daily friction of court and community life. His audience would have known the performance of virtue: appearing patient while quietly compiling a ledger of others’ shortcomings. He punctures that hypocrisy without sounding like a scold. The conditional “If we were faultless” doesn’t accuse; it invites self-examination. It’s pastoral rhetoric with a razor hidden in the velvet.
The subtext is Augustinian: pride makes us allergic to weakness, especially weakness that resembles our own. The defects of “those with whom we associate” land hardest because they’re close enough to threaten our self-image, our comfort, our control. Fenelon’s intent isn’t to excuse bad behavior or demand passive tolerance; it’s to reassign the locus of moral drama. The real battle isn’t winning the argument at dinner. It’s noticing what your irritation reveals about the parts of you still negotiating with humility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Humility |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Francois
Add to List











