"If we're for one another, we're feminists. The rest is semantics"
About this Quote
“The rest is semantics” is doing double duty. On the surface, it dismisses terminology battles - the eye-roll at labels, factions, and ideological branding. Underneath, it’s a savvy rhetorical trap: if you reject the label “feminist,” you’re forced to explain why you’re comfortable with the values but allergic to the name. Buckley turns that squeamishness into the point. Semantics aren’t neutral; they’re where social stigma hides. Calling it “semantics” exposes how much energy gets spent managing perceptions instead of practicing solidarity.
There’s also a theater-world subtext: ensemble thinking over star politics. “For one another” suggests a collective ethic, a refusal of the lone-genius myth that the industry rewards. In that frame, feminism isn’t an abstract identity; it’s a workplace behavior - who you back, who you believe, who you make room for. The quote works because it flatters no one and invites everyone: feminism as decency with a backbone.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Buckley, Betty. (2026, January 16). If we're for one another, we're feminists. The rest is semantics. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-were-for-one-another-were-feminists-the-rest-138402/
Chicago Style
Buckley, Betty. "If we're for one another, we're feminists. The rest is semantics." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-were-for-one-another-were-feminists-the-rest-138402/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If we're for one another, we're feminists. The rest is semantics." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-were-for-one-another-were-feminists-the-rest-138402/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2026.




