"If what the heart approves conforms to proper patterns, then even if one's desires are many, what harm would they be to good order?"
About this Quote
A mind disciplined enough to want the right things is Xun Kuang's quiet flex against both moral romanticism and brute legalism. He sketches an ethic where the problem is not desire as such, but desire untrained. If the heart's approvals "conform to proper patterns" (li, ritual propriety), then abundance of wanting stops being a threat and becomes a kind of social fuel: you can crave, compete, celebrate, mourn, even indulge, and still stay inside the lanes that keep a community coherent.
The intent is polemical. Xunzi is arguing against the easy Confucian optimism that moral goodness naturally blooms from an innately virtuous heart. For him, human impulses arrive raw, partial, grabby. "Proper patterns" are not decorative etiquette; they're technologies of self-management engineered by sages to redirect appetites into forms that don't blow up the household or the state. The line's cleverness is how it reframes restraint: not as scarcity of desire, but as governance of desire. You don't win by wanting less; you win by wanting in ways that can be shared.
The subtext is political. Warring States China was a lab of collapse: courts competing, laws hardening, warfare normalizing. In that climate, "good order" isn't abstract harmony; it's survival. Xunzi offers a third route between Daoist withdrawal and Legalist coercion: cultivate internal assent to external form. When your desires are "many" and still harmless, the state doesn't need constant punishment. It needs citizens whose pleasures already fit the blueprint.
The intent is polemical. Xunzi is arguing against the easy Confucian optimism that moral goodness naturally blooms from an innately virtuous heart. For him, human impulses arrive raw, partial, grabby. "Proper patterns" are not decorative etiquette; they're technologies of self-management engineered by sages to redirect appetites into forms that don't blow up the household or the state. The line's cleverness is how it reframes restraint: not as scarcity of desire, but as governance of desire. You don't win by wanting less; you win by wanting in ways that can be shared.
The subtext is political. Warring States China was a lab of collapse: courts competing, laws hardening, warfare normalizing. In that climate, "good order" isn't abstract harmony; it's survival. Xunzi offers a third route between Daoist withdrawal and Legalist coercion: cultivate internal assent to external form. When your desires are "many" and still harmless, the state doesn't need constant punishment. It needs citizens whose pleasures already fit the blueprint.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Xun
Add to List








