"If women were particular about men's characters, they would never get married at all"
About this Quote
The subtext is pure Shaw: skepticism toward Victorian respectability and the way institutions launder hypocrisy. “Character” here isn’t vague virtue-signaling; it’s the hard stuff - integrity, sexual ethics, responsibility - the qualities polite society applauded in speeches while excusing their absence in men’s private lives. The punchline implies that women’s standards are not the problem; the world is.
Context matters. Shaw wrote in an era when marriage was one of the few socially sanctioned routes to security for many women, with limited legal and economic independence and a culture that treated spinsterhood as failure. Under those constraints, “being particular” becomes a luxury. The line reads like misogyny if you stop at the surface, but Shaw’s signature move is to ventriloquize a brutal truth in order to make the listener uneasy: if marriage requires women to accept compromised men, what does that say about the men - and about a society that calls the arrangement moral?
Quote Details
| Topic | Marriage |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Shaw, George Bernard. (2026, January 15). If women were particular about men's characters, they would never get married at all. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-women-were-particular-about-mens-characters-35029/
Chicago Style
Shaw, George Bernard. "If women were particular about men's characters, they would never get married at all." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-women-were-particular-about-mens-characters-35029/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If women were particular about men's characters, they would never get married at all." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-women-were-particular-about-mens-characters-35029/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





