"If you are looking for smart judging based on merit, skip the Academy Awards next year and pay attention to the Independent Spirit Awards"
About this Quote
Proulx lands the punch with a consumer tip disguised as a cultural indictment: if you want meritocracy, don’t shop at the industry’s flagship store. The line works because it treats “smart judging” as something you can simply opt into, like changing the channel, while quietly arguing that the Oscars have forfeited their authority. “Skip” is the weapon here - casual, almost bored - the verb you use for a bad sequel, not an institution that markets itself as the final word on cinematic greatness.
The subtext is less about loving indie film than distrusting the machinery of prestige. “Based on merit” is a pointed rebuke to the Academy’s ecosystem of campaigns, relationships, narratives, and risk-averse consensus. Proulx isn’t claiming the Independent Spirit Awards are pure; she’s suggesting their incentives run closer to art than to capital. The Spirit Awards’ smaller budgets, outsider branding, and comfort with rough edges make them a stand-in for judgment that hasn’t been fully professionalized into lobbying.
Contextually, the quote sits in a long-running American argument about who gets to define “quality”: large institutions that convert taste into ceremony, or scrappier counter-publics that reward originality before it’s been sanded down for broad approval. Coming from a journalist, it reads like media criticism in one sentence: follow the incentives, and you’ll understand the winners. The irony is that both award shows are performances of legitimacy. Proulx is betting that one still remembers it’s supposed to be about movies.
The subtext is less about loving indie film than distrusting the machinery of prestige. “Based on merit” is a pointed rebuke to the Academy’s ecosystem of campaigns, relationships, narratives, and risk-averse consensus. Proulx isn’t claiming the Independent Spirit Awards are pure; she’s suggesting their incentives run closer to art than to capital. The Spirit Awards’ smaller budgets, outsider branding, and comfort with rough edges make them a stand-in for judgment that hasn’t been fully professionalized into lobbying.
Contextually, the quote sits in a long-running American argument about who gets to define “quality”: large institutions that convert taste into ceremony, or scrappier counter-publics that reward originality before it’s been sanded down for broad approval. Coming from a journalist, it reads like media criticism in one sentence: follow the incentives, and you’ll understand the winners. The irony is that both award shows are performances of legitimacy. Proulx is betting that one still remembers it’s supposed to be about movies.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Annie
Add to List









