"If you can feed your family, give them an education, then you are a success"
About this Quote
Success gets downsized here, and that shrinking is the point. Jami Gertz frames achievement in the most stubbornly practical terms: can you provide food, can you fund learning. No trophies, no personal-brand glow, no “dream big” vapor. Coming from an actress - a profession built on visibility, status, and the fragile economics of being wanted - the line reads like a quiet refusal of the scoreboard she’s expected to play on.
The specific intent is clarifying and moral: success isn’t a feeling or a headline; it’s a set of responsibilities met. “Feed your family” is baseline survival, but it’s also dignity. “Give them an education” pushes the horizon outward, implying mobility, protection against precarity, and a future not held hostage by luck. Gertz isn’t romanticizing hustle; she’s setting a minimum that’s also an ethic: if your life improves the odds for the people you’re accountable to, you’ve made it.
Subtextually, it’s a rebuke to American meritocracy theater, where we treat wealth and fame as proof of virtue. It also gestures at how many people are locked out of this “simple” definition - how structural inequality can make even modest stability feel like winning the lottery. In a celebrity economy that sells exceptionalism, Gertz’s standard is almost radical in its modesty: success as caretaking, not conquest.
The specific intent is clarifying and moral: success isn’t a feeling or a headline; it’s a set of responsibilities met. “Feed your family” is baseline survival, but it’s also dignity. “Give them an education” pushes the horizon outward, implying mobility, protection against precarity, and a future not held hostage by luck. Gertz isn’t romanticizing hustle; she’s setting a minimum that’s also an ethic: if your life improves the odds for the people you’re accountable to, you’ve made it.
Subtextually, it’s a rebuke to American meritocracy theater, where we treat wealth and fame as proof of virtue. It also gestures at how many people are locked out of this “simple” definition - how structural inequality can make even modest stability feel like winning the lottery. In a celebrity economy that sells exceptionalism, Gertz’s standard is almost radical in its modesty: success as caretaking, not conquest.
Quote Details
| Topic | Family |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jami
Add to List







