"If you can kill animals, the same attitude can kill human beings. The mentality is the same which exploits nature and which creates wars"
About this Quote
Kumar is making a deliberately uncomfortable bridge: the move from slaughterhouse to battlefield isn’t just metaphorical, it’s psychological. By framing violence as an “attitude” and a “mentality,” he shifts blame away from isolated acts (hunting, eating meat, waging a particular war) toward a deeper cultural operating system: the habit of treating living beings and living systems as disposable resources. That’s the provocation. He’s not arguing that anyone who eats meat will become a soldier; he’s arguing that the logic that permits domination in one arena rehearses domination in another.
The quote works because it collapses categories modern life works hard to keep separate. We compartmentalize: animals are “food,” forests are “timber,” wars are “geopolitics.” Kumar refuses the compartments and names the common denominator: exploitation. The syntax does a lot of the moral work. “The same attitude” implies continuity; “the mentality is the same” doubles down, insisting this is not a freak exception but a pattern.
Context matters: Kumar comes out of a lineage of Gandhian and ecological activism where nonviolence isn’t only interpersonal ethics but a total stance toward the world. In that tradition, war isn’t an aberration; it’s the loudest expression of a quieter everyday creed: that power justifies taking. The subtext is a challenge to liberal comfort: if you oppose war but live casually inside systems that normalize harm to the vulnerable, your politics may be more aesthetic than structural.
The quote works because it collapses categories modern life works hard to keep separate. We compartmentalize: animals are “food,” forests are “timber,” wars are “geopolitics.” Kumar refuses the compartments and names the common denominator: exploitation. The syntax does a lot of the moral work. “The same attitude” implies continuity; “the mentality is the same” doubles down, insisting this is not a freak exception but a pattern.
Context matters: Kumar comes out of a lineage of Gandhian and ecological activism where nonviolence isn’t only interpersonal ethics but a total stance toward the world. In that tradition, war isn’t an aberration; it’s the loudest expression of a quieter everyday creed: that power justifies taking. The subtext is a challenge to liberal comfort: if you oppose war but live casually inside systems that normalize harm to the vulnerable, your politics may be more aesthetic than structural.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Satish
Add to List






