"If you had an alien race that looked like insects, then they would build robots to look like themselves, not to look like people"
About this Quote
Anderson’s line is a neat little grenade lobbed into the middle of human-centered sci-fi design. It calls out a habit so common we barely notice it: even when we imagine the radically “other,” we keep rebuilding ourselves in the mirror. Put an insectoid species on screen or on the page and, nine times out of ten, their tech still comes stamped with a human silhouette, human ergonomics, human facial cues. The quote isn’t arguing biology so much as exposing a storytelling default.
The specific intent is corrective: if aliens are truly alien, their artifacts should carry that alienness all the way down. An insect race wouldn’t just have different politics; they’d have different proportions, senses, labor systems, and aesthetics. Their robots would be optimized for their bodies and values, not ours. That’s worldbuilding as anthropology, not costume.
The subtext is about power and audience comfort. Humanoid robots are a translation device: they make the strange legible, emotionally readable, merchandisable. Anderson is tugging at that compromise, implying that “relatable” often means “assimilated into human norms.” It’s also a quiet jab at the industry’s production logic: it’s cheaper to put an actor in a suit, cheaper to animate bipedal movement, easier to sell a face that can smile.
Contextually, this sits in late-20th/early-21st-century genre conversations about hardening the plausibility of sci-fi while widening its imagination. It’s less a nitpick than a demand: stop using aliens as set dressing for human stories, and let their design choices reveal an alien interior life.
The specific intent is corrective: if aliens are truly alien, their artifacts should carry that alienness all the way down. An insect race wouldn’t just have different politics; they’d have different proportions, senses, labor systems, and aesthetics. Their robots would be optimized for their bodies and values, not ours. That’s worldbuilding as anthropology, not costume.
The subtext is about power and audience comfort. Humanoid robots are a translation device: they make the strange legible, emotionally readable, merchandisable. Anderson is tugging at that compromise, implying that “relatable” often means “assimilated into human norms.” It’s also a quiet jab at the industry’s production logic: it’s cheaper to put an actor in a suit, cheaper to animate bipedal movement, easier to sell a face that can smile.
Contextually, this sits in late-20th/early-21st-century genre conversations about hardening the plausibility of sci-fi while widening its imagination. It’s less a nitpick than a demand: stop using aliens as set dressing for human stories, and let their design choices reveal an alien interior life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Kevin
Add to List
