"If you knew how meat was made, you'd probably lose your lunch"
About this Quote
The intent is plain: push listeners toward a confrontation most of us outsource. Meat arrives as product, not process, neatly packaged so the violence is invisible and responsibility feels optional. By framing the issue as something you physically couldn’t tolerate if you truly saw it, Lang suggests the system depends on distance, euphemism, and curated ignorance. The subtext is sharper: our appetites are not just preferences but agreements. We keep eating because we keep not-looking.
Context matters here because Lang isn’t a politician; she’s a public artist whose credibility comes from voice, not policy. In the early-’90s moment when celebrity activism around animal rights was gaining volume, her persona carried a particular kind of candor: earnest, unflashy, hard to dismiss as performative outrage. The line functions like a backstage pass offered and rescinded at once: you can know, but knowing will change you. It’s persuasive precisely because it doesn’t argue; it dares your conscience to survive contact with the assembly line.
Quote Details
| Topic | Food |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Lang, K. D. (2026, January 16). If you knew how meat was made, you'd probably lose your lunch. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-you-knew-how-meat-was-made-youd-probably-lose-123762/
Chicago Style
Lang, K. D. "If you knew how meat was made, you'd probably lose your lunch." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-you-knew-how-meat-was-made-youd-probably-lose-123762/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If you knew how meat was made, you'd probably lose your lunch." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-you-knew-how-meat-was-made-youd-probably-lose-123762/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.




