"If you look at the data, the inner city that was the riot zone lost 55,000 jobs in the ten years from 1992 to 2002, instead of gaining a surplus of 50,000"
About this Quote
Numbers do what slogans can’t: they force the argument onto terrain where blame and sympathy get uncomfortable. Hayden’s line is engineered to puncture the easy storyline that “riot zones” are essentially moral failures or policing problems. By anchoring the memory of urban unrest to a single, brutal delta - not just stagnation, but a swing from a hoped-for plus-50,000 to an actual minus-55,000 - he reframes the inner city as an economic extraction site, not a cultural pathology.
The phrasing “If you look at the data” is more than a throat-clear; it’s a challenge. Hayden, a lifelong movement politician, is signaling impatience with punditry and sentimental hand-wringing. He’s also borrowing the authority of technocracy to backstop a fundamentally moral claim: that communities don’t “recover” from rebellion or crackdowns when the labor market is quietly gutted for a decade afterward. The riot becomes a landmark in public memory; the job loss becomes the real long-term emergency that rarely makes the front page.
Context matters: 1992 to 2002 tracks the post-LA uprising era through globalization accelerations, deindustrialization, and the consolidation of low-wage service work, with policy responses that often meant redevelopment without resident prosperity. Hayden’s subtext is prosecutorial: if you want to talk about “law and order,” explain the ordered disappearance of employment. The line turns urban politics into a ledger, and it dares the reader to admit which losses we’ve normalized.
The phrasing “If you look at the data” is more than a throat-clear; it’s a challenge. Hayden, a lifelong movement politician, is signaling impatience with punditry and sentimental hand-wringing. He’s also borrowing the authority of technocracy to backstop a fundamentally moral claim: that communities don’t “recover” from rebellion or crackdowns when the labor market is quietly gutted for a decade afterward. The riot becomes a landmark in public memory; the job loss becomes the real long-term emergency that rarely makes the front page.
Context matters: 1992 to 2002 tracks the post-LA uprising era through globalization accelerations, deindustrialization, and the consolidation of low-wage service work, with policy responses that often meant redevelopment without resident prosperity. Hayden’s subtext is prosecutorial: if you want to talk about “law and order,” explain the ordered disappearance of employment. The line turns urban politics into a ledger, and it dares the reader to admit which losses we’ve normalized.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
