"If you think spreading money around by force seems like an odd definition of fairness, you're not alone"
About this Quote
The second clause, “you’re not alone,” is the real payload. Brooks isn’t just arguing; he’s offering social permission. If you’ve felt uneasy about tax-and-transfer politics, this sentence tells you that unease is reasonable and shared. It’s a subtle antidote to the cultural pressure that can frame skepticism about redistribution as selfishness or cruelty. The move is less about proving a case than about shifting the emotional terrain: from guilt to solidarity.
Context matters because Brooks’s broader project has long been to defend free enterprise and philanthropy as morally serious alternatives to government-led equality. His wording sidesteps technical debates (how much tax, which programs) in favor of a moral reframing: the question isn’t efficiency, it’s legitimacy. The subtext is a warning about euphemisms - that “fairness” can become a rhetorical weapon that makes taking feel like caring.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Brooks, Arthur C. (2026, January 16). If you think spreading money around by force seems like an odd definition of fairness, you're not alone. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-you-think-spreading-money-around-by-force-122789/
Chicago Style
Brooks, Arthur C. "If you think spreading money around by force seems like an odd definition of fairness, you're not alone." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-you-think-spreading-money-around-by-force-122789/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If you think spreading money around by force seems like an odd definition of fairness, you're not alone." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-you-think-spreading-money-around-by-force-122789/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







