"Illegal immigration costs taxpayers $45 billion a year in health care, education, and incarceration expenses"
About this Quote
The point of quoting a clean, terrifying number is to make policy feel like accounting. Keller’s $45 billion figure isn’t just information; it’s a weaponized budget line designed to shift the immigration debate from human stories to invoices. Once the audience accepts the premise that “taxpayers” are the injured party, the next moves (crackdowns, enforcement spending, tightened benefits) read as common-sense fiscal hygiene rather than ideological choice.
The subtext is a careful sorting of who counts as “us.” “Taxpayers” signals deserving insiders; “illegal immigration” collapses a huge range of people and circumstances into a single, lawbreaking mass. The trio of “health care, education, and incarceration” does additional work: it links immigrants to public systems that trigger resentment (ER visits), anxiety about scarcity (schools), and fear/punishment (crime). Education is especially telling. It frames children as a cost center, not a civic investment, and smuggles in the idea that compassion is naive because it has a price tag.
The context, typical of mid-2000s immigration politics, is a media environment where big aggregate estimates circulated as shorthand for legitimacy. The figure’s authority depends less on methodology than on its rhetorical texture: specific enough to sound researched, round enough to be memorable, enormous enough to justify urgency. It invites a moral conclusion without ever stating one: that people can be reduced to deficits, and that belonging is something you earn by not costing the public anything.
The subtext is a careful sorting of who counts as “us.” “Taxpayers” signals deserving insiders; “illegal immigration” collapses a huge range of people and circumstances into a single, lawbreaking mass. The trio of “health care, education, and incarceration” does additional work: it links immigrants to public systems that trigger resentment (ER visits), anxiety about scarcity (schools), and fear/punishment (crime). Education is especially telling. It frames children as a cost center, not a civic investment, and smuggles in the idea that compassion is naive because it has a price tag.
The context, typical of mid-2000s immigration politics, is a media environment where big aggregate estimates circulated as shorthand for legitimacy. The figure’s authority depends less on methodology than on its rhetorical texture: specific enough to sound researched, round enough to be memorable, enormous enough to justify urgency. It invites a moral conclusion without ever stating one: that people can be reduced to deficits, and that belonging is something you earn by not costing the public anything.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ric
Add to List
