"I'm a hardcore libertarian - I want everything legal - but I also believe that you have the right to free association"
About this Quote
Penn Jillette’s line is a neatly staged magic trick: he opens with the bravado of absolute freedom - “everything legal” - then palms a complication into the other hand: “free association.” It’s not a retreat; it’s the real tell. He’s separating state coercion from social consequence, arguing for a society where the law gets out of the way but people don’t have to pretend they like each other.
The specific intent is to defend a libertarian posture that often gets caricatured as “anything goes,” while insulating it from the common rebuttal: that total permissiveness collapses into moral nihilism. “Everything legal” frames government as a blunt instrument that shouldn’t be used to enforce virtue. “Free association” quietly reintroduces boundaries - not through policing, but through choice: who you hire, befriend, platform, boycott, invite into your space.
The subtext is where the friction lives. Jillette is implicitly insisting that tolerance isn’t the same as endorsement, and that a free society includes the freedom to exclude. That can read, depending on the audience, as a defense of individual autonomy or as a philosophical permission slip for discrimination. The tension is the point: libertarianism’s clean rhetoric about liberty can get messy when it collides with power imbalances in the “private” sphere.
Contextually, it’s classic Penn: an entertainer using plainspoken provocation to smuggle in a civic argument. He’s betting that Americans can handle less law and more personal responsibility - even when that responsibility includes saying, bluntly, “not with me.”
The specific intent is to defend a libertarian posture that often gets caricatured as “anything goes,” while insulating it from the common rebuttal: that total permissiveness collapses into moral nihilism. “Everything legal” frames government as a blunt instrument that shouldn’t be used to enforce virtue. “Free association” quietly reintroduces boundaries - not through policing, but through choice: who you hire, befriend, platform, boycott, invite into your space.
The subtext is where the friction lives. Jillette is implicitly insisting that tolerance isn’t the same as endorsement, and that a free society includes the freedom to exclude. That can read, depending on the audience, as a defense of individual autonomy or as a philosophical permission slip for discrimination. The tension is the point: libertarianism’s clean rhetoric about liberty can get messy when it collides with power imbalances in the “private” sphere.
Contextually, it’s classic Penn: an entertainer using plainspoken provocation to smuggle in a civic argument. He’s betting that Americans can handle less law and more personal responsibility - even when that responsibility includes saying, bluntly, “not with me.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Penn
Add to List







