"I'm criticized by the feminists, by the Jewish establishment, by Canadian nationalists. And why not? I've had my pot shots at them. I'm fair game"
About this Quote
Richler’s genius here is the way he makes grievance sound like civic hygiene. The line is built like a shrug, but it’s a sharpened one: a quick inventory of enemies (feminists, “the Jewish establishment,” Canadian nationalists) that reads like a satirist’s roll call of respectable outrage. By listing groups with very different claims to moral authority, he flattens them into the same category: institutions and movements that police boundaries, enforce orthodoxies, and punish heresy. The phrase “Jewish establishment” is especially loaded, implying not a people but a gatekeeping apparatus; he’s picking a fight with leadership and consensus, not identity.
“And why not?” is the pivot. It’s defensive and preemptive, a rhetorical throat-clear that refuses the posture of victimhood while still acknowledging the heat he attracts. The admission “I’ve had my pot shots at them” works as both confession and credential: he is not being “misunderstood”; he meant to provoke. That bluntness is part of the performance. It asserts a writer’s right to offend while also signaling that backlash is not censorship, it’s consequence.
In late-20th-century Canada, with multicultural nationalism hardening into a kind of official self-image, Richler’s combativeness reads like a refusal to let any community - including his own - become untouchable. “I’m fair game” is the bravado of someone who knows the social bargain of public speech: take swings, expect to be hit back. The subtext is less martyrdom than reciprocity, an argument for a literary arena where nobody gets sacred status and nobody gets to opt out of the fight.
“And why not?” is the pivot. It’s defensive and preemptive, a rhetorical throat-clear that refuses the posture of victimhood while still acknowledging the heat he attracts. The admission “I’ve had my pot shots at them” works as both confession and credential: he is not being “misunderstood”; he meant to provoke. That bluntness is part of the performance. It asserts a writer’s right to offend while also signaling that backlash is not censorship, it’s consequence.
In late-20th-century Canada, with multicultural nationalism hardening into a kind of official self-image, Richler’s combativeness reads like a refusal to let any community - including his own - become untouchable. “I’m fair game” is the bravado of someone who knows the social bargain of public speech: take swings, expect to be hit back. The subtext is less martyrdom than reciprocity, an argument for a literary arena where nobody gets sacred status and nobody gets to opt out of the fight.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mordecai
Add to List



