"I'm doing a book, 'Chasing Science,' about the pleasures of science as a spectator sport"
About this Quote
A sly little pitch hides in that phrase "science as a spectator sport": Pohl is promising wonder without homework. He’s not renouncing rigor so much as reframing the relationship between experts and the rest of us. The title, Chasing Science, already suggests motion and appetite, not syllabus. Science becomes something you follow the way you follow a season: with rivalries, cliffhangers, lucky breaks, and the intoxicating feeling that tomorrow’s result might rewrite everything you thought you knew.
The intent is both democratic and slightly mischievous. Pohl, a lifelong science-fiction writer and editor, understood that the public usually meets science as authority or as threat: a lab coat delivering commandments, or a technology arriving with side effects. Calling it a spectator sport flips the emotional valence. It makes discovery legible as drama, replacing deference with fandom. The subtext: you don’t need to be on the field to be implicated in the game. If you can read a box score, you can track a debate about black holes, vaccines, or climate models; you can have taste, suspicion, excitement.
There’s also an implicit critique of how science is sold. "Pleasures" is a pointed word in a culture that treats scientific literacy like moral medicine you’re supposed to swallow. Pohl offers it as entertainment with stakes. Coming from a writer who spent his career turning technical futures into human stories, the line functions as a manifesto: the real gateway drug to understanding isn’t reverence, it’s narrative.
The intent is both democratic and slightly mischievous. Pohl, a lifelong science-fiction writer and editor, understood that the public usually meets science as authority or as threat: a lab coat delivering commandments, or a technology arriving with side effects. Calling it a spectator sport flips the emotional valence. It makes discovery legible as drama, replacing deference with fandom. The subtext: you don’t need to be on the field to be implicated in the game. If you can read a box score, you can track a debate about black holes, vaccines, or climate models; you can have taste, suspicion, excitement.
There’s also an implicit critique of how science is sold. "Pleasures" is a pointed word in a culture that treats scientific literacy like moral medicine you’re supposed to swallow. Pohl offers it as entertainment with stakes. Coming from a writer who spent his career turning technical futures into human stories, the line functions as a manifesto: the real gateway drug to understanding isn’t reverence, it’s narrative.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Frederik
Add to List
