"I'm exchanging molecules every 30 days with the natural world and in a spiritual sense I know I am a part of it and take my photographs from that emotional feeling within me, rather than from an emotional distance as a spectator"
About this Quote
Rowell isn’t just making a case for “being in nature”; he’s trying to sabotage the fantasy that the landscape photographer is a clean-eyed observer, hovering outside the frame. “Exchanging molecules every 30 days” is deliberately unromantic language for an unavoidably intimate fact: your body is porous. Air, water, skin cells, sweat, bacteria - the supposedly separate “natural world” is already moving through you on a schedule. By using a quasi-scientific cadence, he gives spiritual belonging a hard edge, as if to say: this isn’t a mood, it’s physics.
The subtext lands as a critique of the spectator stance that dominates a lot of outdoor imagery: the heroic vista, the human absent or reduced to a tiny silhouette, the camera acting like a god’s-eye extractor of beauty. Rowell rejects “emotional distance” because distance is what turns land into content - scenery to be harvested, branded, consumed. His alternative is intention: photographs made from “within” an emotional and ethical relationship, not from the safe remove of someone passing through.
Context matters. Rowell’s career sits in late-20th-century American landscape culture, where wilderness photography often doubled as advocacy and as commodity. His line tries to reconcile those tensions: to make an image that carries not just aesthetic awe but accountable presence. The photographer isn’t outside nature documenting it; he’s inside nature, documenting a shared metabolism. That’s the quiet provocation: the camera doesn’t grant you innocence. It reveals what kind of participant you decided to be.
The subtext lands as a critique of the spectator stance that dominates a lot of outdoor imagery: the heroic vista, the human absent or reduced to a tiny silhouette, the camera acting like a god’s-eye extractor of beauty. Rowell rejects “emotional distance” because distance is what turns land into content - scenery to be harvested, branded, consumed. His alternative is intention: photographs made from “within” an emotional and ethical relationship, not from the safe remove of someone passing through.
Context matters. Rowell’s career sits in late-20th-century American landscape culture, where wilderness photography often doubled as advocacy and as commodity. His line tries to reconcile those tensions: to make an image that carries not just aesthetic awe but accountable presence. The photographer isn’t outside nature documenting it; he’s inside nature, documenting a shared metabolism. That’s the quiet provocation: the camera doesn’t grant you innocence. It reveals what kind of participant you decided to be.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Galen
Add to List
